---
title: "Nyquist plot of 2.2/[s(s+1)(s²+2s+2)]"
subject: "Control Systems"
chapter: 6
key: "semester_3/control_systems:nyquist-22-s-s1-s2-2s"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/control_systems/nyquist-22-s-s1-s2-2s
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Nyquist plot of 2.2/[s(s+1)(s²+2s+2)]

Control Systems · Chapter 6: Frequency Response Techniques

- Asked in: 2081 Baisakh, 8 marks
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/control_systems/nyquist-22-s-s1-s2-2s
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_3/control_systems/chapter-6

## Question

Draw the Nyquist plot for the open loop transfer function given below and comment on closed loop stability. G(s) = 2.2/[s(s+1)(s²+2s+2)]

## Short answer

The plot crosses at –0.99, just right of –1, so N=0 and Z=P+N=0. The closed-loop system is stable, but only marginally (GM ≈ 0.09 dB, PM ≈ 0.5°).

## Answer

$$
G(s) = \frac{2.2}{s(s+1)(s^2 + 2s + 2)}
$$

Poles: $0, -1, -1 \pm j1$, so **P = 0**. The pole at the origin is indented.

#### Frequency response
$$
\angle G = -90^\circ - \tan^{-1}\omega - \tan^{-1}\frac{2\omega}{2 - \omega^2}, \qquad
|G| = \frac{2.2}{\omega\sqrt{1 + \omega^2}\sqrt{(2 - \omega^2)^2 + 4\omega^2}}
$$

| ω | \|G\| | ∠G | Re | Im |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0⁺ | ∞ | −90° | −2.2 | −∞ |
| 0.1 | 10.95 | −101.5° | −2.17 | −10.73 |
| 0.3 | 3.51 | −124.1° | −1.97 | −2.90 |
| 0.5 | 1.95 | −146.3° | −1.62 | −1.08 |
| 0.816 | 0.990 | −180° | −0.990 | 0 |
| 1 | 0.696 | −198.4° | −0.66 | +0.22 |
| 2 | 0.110 | −270° | 0 | +0.11 |
| ∞ | 0 | −360° | 0 | 0 |

- **Low-frequency asymptote:** $G = \dfrac{1.1}{s(1+s)(1 + s + 0.5s^2)}$, so Re → $-1.1(1 + 1) = -2.2$.
- **Phase crossover:** $s^4 + 3s^3 + 4s^2 + 2s$ at $s = j\omega$ has imaginary part $-3\omega^3 + 2\omega = 0$, so $\omega_{pc} = \sqrt{2/3} = 0.816$ rad/s. The real part is $\omega^4 - 4\omega^2 = 0.444 - 2.667 = -2.222$, so $G = 2.2/(-2.222) = -0.990$.
- The plot cuts the negative real axis at **−0.99**, then passes through the second quadrant (crossing the +j axis at ω = 2, where ∠G = −270°) and reaches the origin along −360°.

```text
              ..                          |
               .                          |
               ..                         |
                ..                        |
                 ..                       |
                  ...                     |
                    ...                   |
                      .....     **********|
--------------------------**@****--------**-------
                      *****     ..........|
                    ***                   |
                  ***                     |
                 **                       |
                **                        |
               **                         |
               *                          |
              **                          |
         -2.2             -0.99           0
* w > 0   . w < 0 (mirror)   @ point (-1, j0)
crosses at -0.99 (w = 0.816), just right of -1
```

#### Stability
**Nyquist criterion:** $Z = P + N$, where $P$ = number of open-loop poles in the RHP, $N$ = net **clockwise** encirclements of $(-1, j0)$ by the Nyquist plot of $G(s)H(s)$, and $Z$ = number of closed-loop poles in the RHP. The closed loop is stable only if $Z = 0$.

The crossing at −0.99 lies just to the **right** of −1, so the point $(-1, j0)$ is not encircled: N = 0 and $Z = 0 + 0 = 0$.

The **closed-loop system is stable, but only barely**:

$$
GM = \frac{1}{0.99} = 1.0101 = 0.087\ \text{dB}, \qquad PM \approx 0.5^\circ \;(\omega_{gc} = 0.811\ \text{rad/s})
$$

The closed-loop poles are at $-0.0026 \pm j0.814$ and $-1.497 \pm j1.039$. The dominant pair is almost on the $j\omega$-axis, so the step response will be a very lightly damped oscillation at about 0.81 rad/s. The gain limit (Routh) is $K < 2.222$, so a 1% gain increase would make the system unstable.

**Answer:** N = 0, Z = 0, so the system is **stable** (marginally: GM ≈ 0.09 dB, PM ≈ 0.5°).

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. How is the phase crossover frequency found for G(s) = 2.2/[s(s+1)(s^2+2s+2)]?
   A. Set the real part of the denominator polynomial to zero
   B. Set the magnitude equal to 1
   C. Set the imaginary part of s^4+3s^3+4s^2+2s at s = jw to zero, giving w = sqrt(2/3) = 0.816
   D. Set w = wn of the quadratic = sqrt(2)
   Answer: C. Phase is -180 deg when the denominator is real, i.e. -3w^3 + 2w = 0, so w = sqrt(2/3) = 0.816 rad/s. (Key point: Phase crossover frequency)

2. The plot cuts the negative real axis at -0.99. What does this give for N and Z?
   A. -0.99 is to the right of -1, so N = 0 and Z = 0 (stable)
   B. -0.99 is left of -1, so N = 2 and Z = 2
   C. -0.99 is to the right of -1, so N = 1 and Z = 1
   D. The crossing is irrelevant; N is always 2 for a type 1 system
   Answer: A. -0.99 lies between -1 and 0, so (-1, j0) is not encircled; with P = 0, Z = 0 and the system is stable. (Key point: Crossing and encirclement)

3. How would you describe the closed-loop stability?
   A. Strongly stable with large margins
   B. Unstable
   C. Stable but only barely: GM about 0.09 dB and PM about 0.5 deg
   D. Stable with infinite gain margin
   Answer: C. GM = 1/0.99 = 1.0101 (0.087 dB) and PM is about 0.5 deg, so poles are almost on the jw axis and a 1% gain rise makes it unstable. (Key point: Quality of stability)

4. What does the plot approach as w tends to 0+?
   A. Real part tends to -2.2 with imaginary part tending to -infinity
   B. Real part tends to 0 with imaginary part tending to -infinity
   C. Magnitude tends to 0 at angle -90 deg
   D. Real part tends to +2.2
   Answer: A. The type 1 factor gives infinite magnitude at -90 deg, and the vertical asymptote lies at Re = -1.1(1+1) = -2.2. (Key point: Low-frequency asymptote)

## Related in Control Systems

- [Nyquist stability of 1/[s(1+2s)(1+s)] and gain margin](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-1-s-1-2s-1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Nyquist stability of (4s+1)/[s²(s+1)(2s+1)]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-4s1-s2-s1-2s1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Nyquist stability of 2/[s(s+1)(2s+1)]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-2-s-s1-2s1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Nyquist stability of 10/[s(s²+2s+4)] and GM](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-10-s-s2-2s-4) — Control Systems, chapter 6
- [Nyquist plot of K/[s(s²+2s+2)] and maximum K](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-k-s-s2-2s-2) — Control Systems, chapter 6
- [Bode plot of 40(s+2)/[(2+s+25s²)(1+2s)s]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Abode-40-s2-2-s-25s2) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×

## Related in other subjects

- [Open loop versus closed loop control](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fembedded_system%3Aopen-vs-closed-loop) — Embedded System, chapter 7, asked 6×
- [Open loop vs closed loop instrumentation](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Finstrumentation_ii%3Aopen-closed-loop) — Instrumentation II, chapter 1, asked 2×
- [MBI features; open vs closed loop compared](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Finstrumentation_ii%3Ambi-features-open-closed) — Instrumentation II, chapter 1
- [Closed loop better than open loop (cruise)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fembedded_system%3Aclosed-loop-better-cruise-integral) — Embedded System, chapter 7
