---
title: "Nyquist contour mapping of 200/[(s+3)(s+1)(s+2)]"
subject: "Control Systems"
chapter: 6
key: "semester_3/control_systems:nyquist-contour-200"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/control_systems/nyquist-contour-200
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Nyquist contour mapping of 200/[(s+3)(s+1)(s+2)]

Control Systems · Chapter 6: Frequency Response Techniques

- Asked in: 2080 Baisakh, 8 marks
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/control_systems/nyquist-contour-200
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_3/control_systems/chapter-6

## Question

What is Nyquist Contour? Map the Nyquist contour of open loop transfer function G(s) = 200/[(s+3)(s+1)(s+2)] into G(s) plane and apply Nyquist criterion to check the stability of closed loop system.

## Short answer

The Nyquist contour encloses the RHP and maps G(s) to a plot crossing at –3.33, giving two clockwise encirclements of –1. With P=0, N=2, so Z=2 and the closed-loop system is unstable.

## Answer

#### Nyquist contour
The **Nyquist contour** is a closed path in the s-plane that encloses the entire right half-plane. It consists of:
1. the whole $j\omega$-axis from $-j\infty$ to $+j\infty$;
2. a semicircle of infinite radius ($s = Re^{j\theta}$, $R \to \infty$, θ from +90° to −90°), traversed **clockwise**;
3. small semicircular indentations (radius ε → 0) around any open-loop poles that lie on the $j\omega$-axis, so the path avoids them.

Mapping this contour through $G(s)H(s)$ gives the Nyquist plot. By the argument principle, the encirclements of $(-1, j0)$ count the RHP zeros of $1 + G(s)H(s)$, i.e. the RHP closed-loop poles.

#### Mapping $G(s) = \dfrac{200}{(s+1)(s+2)(s+3)}$
Open-loop poles: $-1, -2, -3$, so **P = 0**. No indentation is needed.

$$
(j\omega+1)(j\omega+2)(j\omega+3) = (6 - 6\omega^2) + j(11\omega - \omega^3)
$$

| Section | Mapping |
|---|---|
| ω = 0 | $G = 200/6 = 33.3\angle0^\circ$ |
| ω = 1 | $20\angle -90^\circ$ (crosses the −j axis) |
| ω = 2 | $8.77\angle -142.1^\circ$ |
| ω = √11 = 3.317 | Im of denominator = 0, Re = $6 - 66 = -60$, so $G = -3.33$ |
| ω = 5 | $1.25\angle -205.9^\circ$ (second quadrant) |
| ω → +∞ | $0\angle -270^\circ$ |
| ω < 0 | mirror image about the real axis |
| infinite semicircle | maps to the origin |

```text
         |........................
      .....                      ......
    ...  |                            ....
  ...    |                               ...
 ..      |                                 ...
 .       |                                   ..
 ..      |                                    ..
  ..     |                                     .
---*****@*-------------------------------------*--
  **     |                                     *
 **      |                                    **
 *       |                                   **
 **      |                                 ***
  ***    |                               ***
    ***  |                            ****
      *****                      ******
         |************************
   -3.33                                     33.3
* w > 0   . w < 0 (mirror)   @ point (-1, j0)
w = 0 at 33.3; crosses at -3.33 (w = 3.317)
```

#### Nyquist criterion
**Nyquist criterion:** $Z = P + N$, where $P$ = number of open-loop poles in the RHP, $N$ = net **clockwise** encirclements of $(-1, j0)$ by the Nyquist plot of $G(s)H(s)$, and $Z$ = number of closed-loop poles in the RHP. The closed loop is stable only if $Z = 0$.

The plot crosses the negative real axis at **−3.33**, to the left of −1. The closed curve (ω from −∞ to +∞) goes round the point $(-1, j0)$ **twice clockwise**, so N = 2.

$$
Z = P + N = 0 + 2 = 2
$$

The **closed-loop system is unstable**, with two closed-loop poles in the RHP.

- Gain margin: $GM = 1/3.33 = 0.3 = -10.5$ dB (negative).
- The gain would have to be reduced below $200/3.33 = 60$ for stability.
- Check (Routh): $s^3 + 6s^2 + 11s + 206$ gives $6 \times 11 = 66 < 206$, so it is unstable. ✓

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. What is the Nyquist contour?
   A. A closed s-plane path enclosing the entire right half-plane: the jw axis plus an infinite clockwise semicircle, with indentations around jw-axis poles
   B. A closed path enclosing only the left half-plane
   C. The locus of G(jw) for w from 0 to infinity
   D. A circle of unit radius around -1
   Answer: A. The contour encloses the whole RHP so encirclements reveal RHP zeros of 1 + GH, i.e. unstable closed-loop poles. (Key point: Definition of Nyquist contour)

2. For G(s) = 200/[(s+1)(s+2)(s+3)], what are P and the indentation requirement?
   A. P = 3, indentation at each pole
   B. P = 1, indentation at -1
   C. P = 0, no indentation needed
   D. P = 0, indentation at the origin
   Answer: C. All poles (-1, -2, -3) are in the LHP and none is on the jw axis. (Key point: P and indentation)

3. Where does the plot cross the negative real axis?
   A. At -3.33 when w = 3.317 rad/s
   B. At -33.3 when w = 0
   C. At -1 when w = 1
   D. At -60 when w = 3.317
   Answer: A. The denominator is real when 11w - w^3 = 0, so w = sqrt(11); there the real part is 6 - 66 = -60 and G = 200/(-60) = -3.33. (Key point: Real-axis crossing)

4. The crossing at -3.33 is left of -1. What are N and Z?
   A. N = 0, Z = 0, stable
   B. N = 2 clockwise, Z = 2, unstable
   C. N = -2, Z = -2, stable
   D. N = 1, Z = 1, unstable
   Answer: B. The closed curve encircles (-1, j0) twice clockwise, so Z = 0 + 2 = 2 RHP closed-loop poles; GM = -10.5 dB agrees. (Key point: Stability conclusion)

## Close variants set in other exams

- [Nyquist contour mapping of 300/[(s+3)(s+1)(s+2)]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-contour-300) — Control Systems, chapter 6

## Related in Control Systems

- [Traffic light system of Kathmandu: open or closed loop](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Atraffic-light-justify) — Control Systems, chapter 1
- [Nyquist criterion from given pole-zero and Nyquist plot](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-criteria-from-plot) — Control Systems, chapter 6
- [Nyquist stability of (4s+1)/[s²(s+1)(2s+1)]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-4s1-s2-s1-2s1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Nyquist stability of 2/[s(s+1)(2s+1)]](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-2-s-s1-2s1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Nyquist stability of 1/[s(1+2s)(1+s)] and gain margin](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Anyquist-1-s-1-2s-1) — Control Systems, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Short note: Nyquist stability criterion](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Ashort-nyquist-criterion) — Control Systems, chapter 6

## Related in other subjects

- [Open loop versus closed loop control](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fembedded_system%3Aopen-vs-closed-loop) — Embedded System, chapter 7, asked 6×
- [Open loop vs closed loop instrumentation](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Finstrumentation_ii%3Aopen-closed-loop) — Instrumentation II, chapter 1, asked 2×
- [MBI features; open vs closed loop compared](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Finstrumentation_ii%3Ambi-features-open-closed) — Instrumentation II, chapter 1
- [Closed loop better than open loop (cruise)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fembedded_system%3Aclosed-loop-better-cruise-integral) — Embedded System, chapter 7
