---
title: "Graphical method min:z=4x₁+3x₂+x₃"
subject: "Mathematics III"
chapter: 5
key: "semester_3/mathematics_iii:graphical-method-min-z-4x-3x"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/mathematics_iii/graphical-method-min-z-4x-3x
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Graphical method min:z=4x₁+3x₂+x₃

Mathematics III · Chapter 5: Linear Programming

- Asked in: 2070 Chaitra, 5 marks
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_3/mathematics_iii/graphical-method-min-z-4x-3x
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_3/mathematics_iii/chapter-5

## Question

Graphically minimize z = 4x₁ + 3x₂ + x₃ subject to x₁ + 2x₂ + 4x₃ ≥ 12, 3x₁ + 2x₂ + x₃ ≥ 8 and x₁, x₂, x₃ ≥ 0.

## Short answer

The three-variable primal is solved via its dual, which has two variables and is drawn graphically. The dual maximum is W = 8 at w₁ = 0, w₂ = 1; by duality the primal optimum is x₁ = 0, x₂ = 0, x₃ = 8, with Min z = 8.

## Answer

**Reading of the question.** The problem as printed has three variables (x₁, x₂, x₃), so its feasible region lies in three-dimensional space and cannot be drawn on a plane. It is solved here graphically through its dual, which has only two variables (one per constraint) and can be drawn. The solution is the one for the problem exactly as printed.

**Step 1: Write the dual.** Primal: Minimize z = 4x₁ + 3x₂ + x₃ subject to x₁ + 2x₂ + 4x₃ ≥ 12, 3x₁ + 2x₂ + x₃ ≥ 8, x₁, x₂, x₃ ≥ 0. The dual is:

```text
Maximize W = 12w₁ + 8w₂
subject to   w₁ + 3w₂ ≤ 4
             2w₁ + 2w₂ ≤ 3
             4w₁ + w₂ ≤ 1
             w₁, w₂ ≥ 0
```

(Each primal variable gives one dual constraint: the coefficients of x₁ are (1, 3), of x₂ are (2, 2) and of x₃ are (4, 1), and the costs 4, 3, 1 become the right-hand sides.)

**Step 2: Draw the dual constraint lines.** Replace each inequality by an equation, find the intercepts and decide which side of the line is allowed (test the origin).

| Constraint | Line | Meets x-axis | Meets y-axis | Allowed side |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) w₁ + 3w₂ ≤ 4 | w₁ + 3w₂ = 4 | (4, 0) | (0, 4/3) | towards the origin |
| (2) 2w₁ + 2w₂ ≤ 3 | 2w₁ + 2w₂ = 3 | (3/2, 0) | (0, 3/2) | towards the origin |
| (3) 4w₁ + w₂ ≤ 1 | 4w₁ + w₂ = 1 | (1/4, 0) | (0, 1) | towards the origin |

Also w₁ ≥ 0 and w₂ ≥ 0, so the region lies in the first quadrant.

**Step 3: Feasible region of the dual.** The region satisfying all constraints is the shaded polygon below (dots), with corner points marked A, B, C, ….

```text
   2|                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |                                            
    |C                                           
    |..                                          
    |...                                         
    |.....                                       
    |......                                      
    |.......                                     
    |.........                                   
    |..........                                  
   0|A..........B                                
    +--------------------------------------------
     0                                          1
```

**Step 4: Corner points and the value of W.** The optimum of a linear function over a convex polygon occurs at a corner point.

| Point | Coordinates | Lines meeting there | W = 12w₁ + 8w₂ |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | (0, 0) | w₁ = 0, w₂ = 0 | 0 |
| B | (1/4, 0) | (3), w₂ = 0 | 3 |
| C | (0, 1) | (3), w₁ = 0 | 8 |

**Step 5: Conclusion.** The largest W is 8 at (w₁, w₂) = (0, 1). By the duality theorem, Min z = Max W = 8.

**Step 6: Primal values (complementary slackness).** At (0, 1) the first two dual constraints are not tight (0 + 3 = 3 < 4 and 0 + 2 = 2 < 3), so x₁ = 0 and x₂ = 0. Since w₂ = 1 > 0, the second primal constraint is tight: 3(0) + 2(0) + x₃ = 8, so x₃ = 8. The first primal constraint is then 4(8) = 32 ≥ 12, which holds with w₁ = 0.

Check: z = 4(0) + 3(0) + 1(8) = 8, and all primal constraints are satisfied.

**Answer:** Minimum z = 8 at x₁ = 0, x₂ = 0, x₃ = 8.

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. Why is this three-variable problem solved graphically through its dual?
   A. The dual always has a smaller optimal value
   B. The primal has no feasible solution
   C. The primal has three variables and cannot be drawn on a plane, while the dual has only two variables
   D. Graphical methods only work for maximization problems
   Answer: C. A three-variable region needs 3D space; the dual has one variable per primal constraint, i.e. two, so it can be drawn. (Key point: Why use the dual)

2. What are the dual constraints for this primal (columns of x1, x2, x3 are (1,3), (2,2), (4,1); costs 4, 3, 1)?
   A. w1 + 3w2 <= 4, 2w1 + 2w2 <= 3, 4w1 + w2 <= 1
   B. w1 + 3w2 >= 4, 2w1 + 2w2 >= 3, 4w1 + w2 >= 1
   C. w1 + 2w2 + 4w3 <= 12 and 3w1 + 2w2 + w3 <= 8
   D. w1 + 2w2 <= 4, 3w1 + 2w2 <= 3, 4w1 + w2 <= 1
   Answer: A. Each primal variable gives one dual constraint of type <=, using its column as coefficients and its cost as the right-hand side. (Key point: Forming the dual)

3. The largest W = 12w1 + 8w2 over the dual region is 8 at (0, 1). What does this give for the primal?
   A. Min z = 12
   B. Min z = 8, since Min z = Max W by the duality theorem
   C. Max z = 8
   D. Min z = 0 because the origin is feasible
   Answer: B. By the duality theorem the optimal values of primal and dual are equal, so Min z = Max W = 8. (Key point: Optimum and duality theorem)

## Related in Mathematics III

- [Graphical max/min min:Z=5x₁+3x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Agraphical-max-min-min-z-5x) — Mathematics III, chapter 5, asked 12×
- [Big-M method min:Z=4x₁+2x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Abig-m-method-min-z-4x) — Mathematics III, chapter 5
- [Duality LPP min:Z=3x₁+2x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Aduality-lpp-min-z-3x-2x) — Mathematics III, chapter 5, asked 3×
- [Duality LPP min:Z=3x₁+2x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Aduality-lpp-min-z-3x-2x-two) — Mathematics III, chapter 5, asked 3×
- [Graphical method max:z=2x₁+3x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Agraphical-method-max-z-2x-3x) — Mathematics III, chapter 5, asked 12×
- [Graphical max/min opt:Z=4x₁+5x₂](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fmathematics_iii%3Agraphical-max-min-opt-z-4x) — Mathematics III, chapter 5

## Related in other subjects

- [Convergence of 2x+3x²/8+4x³/27+...](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_2%2Fmathematics%3Aconvergence-2x-3x2-8-4x3) — Mathematics, chapter 6, asked 3×
- [Centre, axes of ellipse 2x²+3y²−4x−12y+13=0](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_1%2Fmathematics_i%3Aellipse-2x2-3y2-centre-axes) — Mathematics I, chapter 3, asked 7×
- [Difference eq x(k+2)+2x(k+1)+3x(k)=0](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_4%2Fapplied_mathematics%3Adifference-eq-2x1-3x-x0-0-x1-2) — Applied Mathematics, chapter 2, asked 5×
- [Difference equation x(k+2)+3x(k+1)+2x(k)=0](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fdigital_control_system%3Adifference-equation-x0-0-x1-1) — Digital Control System, chapter 2, asked 5×
