---
title: "Chebyshev characteristics and minimum order"
subject: "Filter Design"
chapter: 2
key: "semester_5/filter_design:chebyshev-characteristics-order-25db"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_5/filter_design/chebyshev-characteristics-order-25db
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Chebyshev characteristics and minimum order

Filter Design · Chapter 2: Approximation Methods

- Asked in: 2080 Baisakh, 3+4+3 marks
- Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5 on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_5/filter_design/chebyshev-characteristics-order-25db
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_5/filter_design/chapter-2

## Question

What are the characteristics of chebyshev magnitude response? Derive an expression to calculate the order (n) of a Chebyshev filter for given lowpass specifications. Determine the minimum order n of chebyshev filter for following specifications. αp = 1 dB, αs = 25 dB and (ωs/ωp) = 1.5, where the symbols have their usual meanings.

## Short answer

Chebyshev response has equiripple passband, monotonic stopband, and steeper transition than Butterworth. Order n ≥ arccosh(√((10^(0.1αs)-1)/(10^(0.1αp)-1)))/arccosh(ωs/ωp). For αp=1dB, αs=25dB, ωs/ωp=1.5, minimum n=5.

## Answer

The Chebyshev (Type I) response is an all-pole approximation that allows equal ripple in the passband to get a much steeper transition into the stopband.

#### Characteristics of the Chebyshev magnitude response

- **Equiripple passband:** $|T|$ oscillates between $1$ and $1/\sqrt{1+\varepsilon^2}$ in $0 \le \Omega \le 1$; the ripple height is $\alpha_{max}$ dB and is set by $\varepsilon$.
- **Number of ripples:** the passband contains $n$ half-cycles of ripple between $\Omega = 0$ and $\Omega = 1$, so a higher order gives more ripples (of the same height).
- **DC value:** $|T(0)| = 1$ for odd $n$ and $1/\sqrt{1+\varepsilon^2}$ for even $n$.
- **Monotonic stopband:** beyond $\Omega = 1$ the response falls monotonically; the asymptotic roll-off is $-20n$ dB/decade, but the transition is much sharper than Butterworth of the same order (about $6(n-1)$ dB more stopband attenuation for the same $\varepsilon$).
- **All-pole function:** no finite transmission zeros; poles lie on an **ellipse** in the s-plane.
- **Phase/delay:** phase is more non-linear and group delay has a larger peak near the band edge than Butterworth (poorer transient response, more ringing).
- For a given specification it needs a **lower order** than Butterworth, so fewer components.

```text
 |T|
 1  |~\  /~\  /~\
    |  \/   \/   \   <- equal ripple (alpha_max)
    |             \
    |              \_
    |                \___  monotonic stopband
    +-----------------+-------> w
                     wp
```

#### Derivation of the order

The Chebyshev low-pass magnitude response (normalized so that the passband edge is $\Omega = \omega/\omega_p = 1$) is

$$
|T(j\Omega)|^2 = \frac{1}{1+\varepsilon^2 C_n^2(\Omega)}
$$

where $C_n(\Omega)$ is the Chebyshev polynomial of order $n$:

$$
C_n(\Omega) = \begin{cases} \cos(n\cos^{-1}\Omega), & |\Omega| \le 1 \\ \cosh(n\cosh^{-1}\Omega), & |\Omega| > 1 \end{cases}
$$

The attenuation in dB is $\alpha(\Omega) = 10\log_{10}\left[1+\varepsilon^2 C_n^2(\Omega)\right]$.

**Step 1: ripple factor from the passband edge.** At $\Omega = 1$, $C_n(1) = 1$ for every $n$, so the attenuation is exactly $\alpha_{max}$:

$$
\alpha_{max} = 10\log_{10}(1+\varepsilon^2) \;\Rightarrow\; \varepsilon^2 = 10^{0.1\alpha_{max}} - 1
$$

**Step 2: stopband condition.** At $\Omega_s = \omega_s/\omega_p\ (>1)$ the attenuation must be at least $\alpha_{min}$:

$$
10\log_{10}\left[1+\varepsilon^2 C_n^2(\Omega_s)\right] \ge \alpha_{min}
\;\Rightarrow\; C_n^2(\Omega_s) \ge \frac{10^{0.1\alpha_{min}}-1}{\varepsilon^2}
$$

**Step 3: solve for n.** Since $\Omega_s > 1$, $C_n(\Omega_s) = \cosh(n\cosh^{-1}\Omega_s)$:

$$
\cosh(n\cosh^{-1}\Omega_s) \ge \sqrt{\frac{10^{0.1\alpha_{min}}-1}{10^{0.1\alpha_{max}}-1}}
$$

$$
n \ge \frac{\cosh^{-1}\sqrt{\dfrac{10^{0.1\alpha_{min}}-1}{10^{0.1\alpha_{max}}-1}}}{\cosh^{-1}\left(\dfrac{\omega_s}{\omega_p}\right)}
$$

The order is the next whole number above this value. (Useful identity: $\cosh^{-1}x = \ln\left(x+\sqrt{x^2-1}\right)$.)

#### Minimum order for the given specification

Given $\alpha_p = 1$ dB, $\alpha_s = 25$ dB, $\omega_s/\omega_p = 1.5$.

$$
\begin{aligned}
\varepsilon^2 &= 10^{0.1} - 1 = 0.25893 \\
10^{2.5} - 1 &= 315.2278 \\
\sqrt{\frac{315.2278}{0.25893}} &= 34.8919 \\
\cosh^{-1}(34.8919) &= 4.2452 \\
\cosh^{-1}(1.5) &= 0.9624 \\
n &\ge \frac{4.2452}{0.9624} = 4.411
\end{aligned}
$$

**Answer: minimum order n = 5.**

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. What is the passband behaviour of a Chebyshev type I filter?
   A. Ripple only in the stopband
   B. Equal ripple between 1 and 1/sqrt(1+eps^2), with n half-cycles in 0 to 1
   C. Monotonic and maximally flat
   D. Ripple growing with frequency
   Answer: B. The passband has equal-height ripples set by epsilon, with n half-cycles up to w = 1. (Key point: Equiripple passband)

2. What is |T(0)| for a Chebyshev filter?
   A. 0
   B. 1 for odd n and 1/sqrt(1+eps^2) for even n
   C. 1/sqrt(1+eps^2) for all n
   D. 1 for all n
   Answer: B. Cn(0) is +/-1 for even n and 0 for odd n, so gain at DC is lower for even n. (Key point: DC gain)

3. For 1 dB, 25 dB and ws/wp = 1.5 the formula gives 4.411. n is:
   A. 5
   B. 6
   C. 4
   D. 4.411
   Answer: A. Round up to n = 5. (Key point: Order result)

4. Which statement is correct for Chebyshev versus Butterworth?
   A. Chebyshev poles lie on the jw axis
   B. Chebyshev poles lie on an ellipse and it needs a lower order for a given spec
   C. Chebyshev poles lie on a circle and it needs a higher order
   D. Chebyshev has linear phase and needs a higher order
   Answer: B. Elliptical pole locus gives steeper transition so fewer components, at the cost of poorer phase/delay. (Key point: Pole locus and order)

## Related in Filter Design

- [Chebyshev characteristics and order (0.25 dB, 40 dB)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Achebyshev-characteristics-order-40db) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Inverse Chebyshev characteristics and order (0.4 dB, 16 dB)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Ainverse-chebyshev-characteristics-order-16db) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Chebyshev order (0.25 dB, 18 dB, 1650 rad/s)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Achebyshev-order-0-25db-1650) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Inverse Chebyshev order (0.5 dB, 25 dB, 1800 rad/s)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Ainverse-chebyshev-order-1800-25db) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 5×
- [Chebyshev characteristics and order (1500/4500 rad/s)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Achebyshev-characteristics-order-4500) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Chebyshev response and order (0.5 dB, 22 dB)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Ffilter_design%3Achebyshev-response-order-22db) — Filter Design, chapter 2, asked 2×

## Related in other subjects

- [Pole-zero and magnitude response, third order](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fdigital_signal_analysis_and_processing%3Amagnitude-response-0-4-0-2-0-5) — Digital Signal Analysis and Processing, chapter 3, asked 3×
- [Magnitude response of second order system](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fdigital_signal_analysis_and_processing%3Amagnitude-response-0-5-0-3) — Digital Signal Analysis and Processing, chapter 3, asked 2×
- [Derive development length expression](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fdesign_of_rcc_structure%3Aderive-development-length-expression) — Design of RCC Structure, chapter 6, asked 6×
- [Second order model from step response (peak 1.25)](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Fcontrol_systems%3Asecond-order-from-step-125) — Control Systems, chapter 3
