---
title: "ERR to select between projects A and B"
subject: "Engineering Economics"
chapter: 4
key: "semester_6/engineering_economics:err-project-a-b-18-12"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_6/engineering_economics/err-project-a-b-18-12
site: BCT Engineering
---

# ERR to select between projects A and B

Engineering Economics · Chapter 4: Comparative Analysis of Alternatives

- Asked in: 2066 Magh, 8 marks
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_6/engineering_economics/err-project-a-b-18-12
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_6/engineering_economics/chapter-4

## Question

Select the best project using ERR method. MARR = 18%, E = 12%.
| Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project A | -40,000 | -38,000 | +35,000 | +35,000 | +35,000 | +35,000 |
| Project B | -60,000 | +25,000 | +40,000 | -50,000 | +50,000 | +75,000 |

## Short answer

Compound receipts at reinvestment rate 12%, discount expenditures at the same rate. ERR(A) = 17.74% (< 18%), ERR(B) = 18.84% (>= 18%). Project B is acceptable; A is not. Select B.

## Answer

ERR: receipts are compounded to the end of year 5 at ε = 12%, expenditures are discounted to year 0 at ε, and the ERR i' is found from PW(E)(1 + i')^5 = FW(R). A project is acceptable if ERR ≥ MARR = 18%.

#### Project A
FW(R) = 35,000[(1.12)³ + (1.12)² + (1.12)¹ + 1] = 35,000(F/A, 12%, 4) = 35,000(4.7793) = 167,276
PW(E) = 40,000 + 38,000(P/F, 12%, 1) = 40,000 + 38,000(0.8929) = 73,929
(1 + i')^5 = 2.2627 → **ERR(A) = 17.74%** < 18%, so A is not acceptable.

#### Project B
Receipts: year 1 = 25,000, year 2 = 40,000, year 4 = 50,000, year 5 = 75,000. Expenditures: year 0 = 60,000, year 3 = 50,000.
FW(R) = 25,000(1.12)⁴ + 40,000(1.12)³ + 50,000(1.12)¹ + 75,000 = 39,338 + 56,197 + 56,000 + 75,000 = 226,535
PW(E) = 60,000 + 50,000(P/F, 12%, 3) = 60,000 + 50,000(0.7118) = 95,589
(1 + i')^5 = 2.3699 → **ERR(B) = 18.84%** > 18%, so B is acceptable.

#### Incremental check (B - A)
Increment flows: [-20000, 63000, 5000, -85000, 15000, 40000]
ERR(B - A) = 15.15% < 18%.
This is the return on the extra investment in B. Since A itself fails the MARR test, it is not a valid defender; the comparison to apply is B against the "do nothing" option, which B passes.

| Project | ERR | Acceptable at MARR 18%? |
|---|---|---|
| A | 17.74% | No |
| B | 18.84% | Yes |

**Answer: Select Project B** (ERR 18.84% ≥ 18%). Project A (ERR 17.74%) falls just below the MARR.

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. In the ERR method, how are receipts and expenditures treated before ERR is found?
   A. Receipts are discounted to year 0 and expenditures compounded to year 5 at MARR
   B. Receipts are compounded to the end of year 5 and expenditures discounted to year 0, both at the reinvestment rate E
   C. Both are compounded to year 5 at MARR
   D. Both are discounted to year 0 at the ERR itself
   Answer: B. ERR uses the external reinvestment rate E: FW of receipts at the end of the life and PW of expenditures at year 0, then PW(E)(1+i')^n = FW(R). (Key point: ERR compounding and discounting)

2. Project A has ERR = 17.74% with MARR = 18%. What is the conclusion?
   A. Accept A because ERR is close to MARR
   B. Accept A because ERR is above E = 12%
   C. Reject A because ERR is below MARR
   D. Cannot decide without IRR
   Answer: C. A project is acceptable only if ERR >= MARR; 17.74% < 18%, so A is not acceptable. (Key point: Acceptance rule)

3. In Project B, which flows are classified as expenditures when computing ERR?
   A. Year 0 (60,000) and year 3 (50,000)
   B. Only year 0 (60,000)
   C. Years 1 and 2 only
   D. Year 3 (50,000) and year 5 (75,000)
   Answer: A. Negative flows (year 0 and year 3) are expenditures discounted to year 0; the positive flows in years 1, 2, 4, 5 are receipts compounded to year 5. (Key point: Project B cash flows)

4. Why is Project B selected?
   A. It has the larger initial investment
   B. Its incremental ERR over A is above 18%
   C. Its ERR of 18.84% is at least the MARR of 18%, while A fails
   D. It has the lower FW of receipts
   Answer: C. B passes the MARR test (18.84% >= 18%) and A does not; the B-A increment (15.15%) is not needed since A is not a valid defender. (Key point: Final selection)

## Related in Engineering Economics

- [ERR method to select best of three projects](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Aerr-select-best-abc) — Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- [ERR with MARR 12% and reinvestment 14%](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Aerr-reinvestment-14) — Engineering Economics, chapter 3
- [Best of three mutually exclusive projects, 10-year study](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Amutually-exclusive-abc-study-10-years) — Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- [ERR to select best proposal A or B](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Aerr-proposals-a-b-25) — Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- [Repeatability assumption, select best of three projects](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Arepeatability-abc-14) — Engineering Economics, chapter 4, asked 2×
- [Best project for 4-year and 8-year service periods](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Fengineering_economics%3Aselect-best-project-fw-4yr-irr) — Engineering Economics, chapter 4

## Related in other subjects

- [EVA; 60 days, 25% work, Rs 12,00,000](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fproject_engineering%3Aeva-numerical-60-days-25-percent) — Project Engineering, chapter 4
- [Best financing option; EBIT Rs 350,000](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fproject_engineering%3Abest-option-two-options-ebit-350000) — Project Engineering, chapter 6
- [EVA; 60 days, 25% work, 50% budget spent](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Fproject_engineering%3Aeva-numerical-60-days-half-budget) — Project Engineering, chapter 4
- [Gumbel flood at given risk, 50-year project life](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Fengineering_hydrology%3Agumbel-risk-63-58-4200) — Engineering Hydrology, chapter 6
