---
title: "Double-stub 3λ/8 for 300+j300 Ω antenna"
subject: "RF and Microwave Engineering"
chapter: 2
key: "semester_7/rf_and_microwave_engineering:double-stub-300-j300"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_7/rf_and_microwave_engineering/double-stub-300-j300
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Double-stub 3λ/8 for 300+j300 Ω antenna

RF and Microwave Engineering · Chapter 2: RF and Microwave Transmission Lines

- Asked in: 2071 Bhadra, 10 marks
- Video: [Double shunt stub matching network problem solving using smith chart by Dr. Niraj Kumar VIT Chennai](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuO61UXmMlw) — RF Design Basics
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_7/rf_and_microwave_engineering/double-stub-300-j300
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_7/rf_and_microwave_engineering/chapter-2

## Question

Design a double stub matching network using three-eighths wavelength (3λ/8) separation that match an antenna having load of 300+j300 Ohm connected to a 300 Ohm transmission line. Justify your design.

## Short answer

Load 300+j300 Ω on 300 Ω line, 3λ/8 spacing, short stubs at load. Design: l1=0.1006λ, l2=0.0558λ (Solution A). Load conductance g=0.5 lies outside forbidden region g>2. Short stubs minimize loss and size; VSWR reduces from 2.62 to 1.

## Answer

**Given:** antenna load ZL = 300 + j300 Ω, Z0 = 300 Ω, stub spacing 3λ/8. **Assumptions:** short-circuited 300 Ω stubs, with the first stub at the antenna terminals.

#### Step 1: Normalise and convert to admittance
```text
zL = 1.000 + j1.000
yL = 1/zL = 0.500 − j0.500
ΓL = 0.447∠63.4°,  VSWR = 2.618
```
On the chart, zL is at 0.1619λ WTG and yL is diametrically opposite, at 0.4119λ WTG.

#### Step 2: First stub at the load
The first stub is placed at the load, so y1 = yL = 0.500 − j0.500.

#### Step 3: Forbidden-region check and rotated g = 1 circle
```text
βd = 360° × 0.375 = 135°
g must be ≤ 1/sin²βd = 2.000
g1 = 0.5000  → matchable
```
Rotate the g = 1 circle by 0.375λ (270° on the chart) toward the load. The point just after stub 1 must lie on this rotated circle, so move from y1 along the constant g = 0.500 circle until it meets the rotated circle.

#### Step 4: Susceptance of stub 1
Analytically (Pozar), with t = tan βd:
```text
t = tan 135° = −1.0000
b1 = −B + [1 ± √((1+t²)g − g²t²)]/t
(1+t²)g − g²t² = 0.7500, √ = 0.8660
Sol A: b1 = −1.3660
Sol B: b1 = +0.3660
```

#### Step 5: Move 0.375λ to stub 2 and find b2
```text
Sol A: y after stub 1 = 0.500 − j1.866
   (0.3247λ) → after 0.375λ: y2 = 1.000 + j2.732
   b2 = −2.7321
Sol B: y after stub 1 = 0.500 − j0.134
   (0.4721λ) → after 0.375λ: y2 = 1.000 − j0.732
   b2 = +0.7321
```
Both y2 values lie on the g = 1 circle, as required.

#### Step 6: Stub lengths
- For a short-circuited stub: y = −j cot βl, so l = (1/2π)·cot⁻¹(−b); measure from the short-circuit point (y = ∞, right end of the chart) toward the generator.
```text
Sol A short: l1 = 0.1006λ, l2 = 0.0558λ
Sol B short: l1 = 0.3058λ, l2 = 0.3506λ
```

| Quantity | Solution A | Solution B |
|---|---|---|
| Stub 1 from load | at load | at load |
| Stub spacing | 0.375λ | 0.375λ |
| b1, b2 | -1.366, -2.732 | 0.366, 0.732 |
| Short l1, l2 | 0.1006λ, 0.0558λ | 0.3058λ, 0.3506λ |

**Answer (design):** solution A, with the first stub at the load (l1 = 0.1006λ), the second stub 0.375λ away (l2 = 0.0558λ).

```text
 Z0=300Ω          3λ/8          
 o------+---------------+--------[300+j300Ω]
        |               |
     stub 2          stub 1
     l2=0.0558λ       l1=0.1006λ
       SC              SC
```

#### Justification
- **Matchable:** the forbidden region for 3λ/8 spacing is g > 2. The load conductance g = 0.5 lies outside it, so the design is possible.
- **Perfect match:** the admittance at stub 2 becomes 1 + j0. VSWR drops from 2.62 to 1, and no power is reflected (Γ goes from 0.447 to 0).
- **Choice of solution A:** both stubs are short (about 0.1λ and 0.06λ). This gives the least stub loss, the widest bandwidth and the smallest size.
- **Short-circuited stubs** are preferred: they do not radiate from their ends and are easy to tune with sliding shorts.
- **3λ/8 spacing** gives the same forbidden region as λ/8 but more physical room between the junctions.
- Solution B (l1 = 0.3058λ, l2 = 0.3506λ) is also valid but longer.

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. With 3λ/8 spacing, loads with what conductance cannot be matched, and is g = 0.5 matchable?
   A. g > 1 cannot be matched, so g = 0.5 is matchable only just
   B. g > 1/sin^2(135°) = 2 cannot be matched; g = 0.5 is matchable
   C. g < 2 cannot be matched, so g = 0.5 fails
   D. 3λ/8 has no forbidden region
   Answer: B. sin^2(135°) = 0.5, so the limit is g = 2; the load has g = 0.5, outside the forbidden region. (Key point: Forbidden region)

2. What are zL and yL for ZL = 300 + j300 Ω on a 300 Ω line?
   A. zL = 1 + j1, yL = 1 - j1
   B. zL = 300 + j300, yL = 0.5 + j0.5
   C. zL = 0.5 - j0.5, yL = 1 + j1
   D. zL = 1 + j1, yL = 0.5 - j0.5
   Answer: D. zL = ZL/Z0 = 1 + j1 and yL = 1/zL = 0.5 - j0.5, the diametrically opposite point on the chart. (Key point: Normalised values)

3. Why is solution A (l1 = 0.1006λ, l2 = 0.0558λ) chosen over B?
   A. Both stubs are short, giving less loss, wider bandwidth and smaller size
   B. It is the only solution that gives a perfect match
   C. It needs open-circuited stubs
   D. It uses the larger stub susceptances to improve bandwidth
   Answer: A. Both solutions match, but A has shorter stubs, which store less energy, so lower loss and wider bandwidth. (Key point: Chosen solution)

4. Why are short-circuited stubs preferred in the justification?
   A. They have infinite input admittance at all lengths
   B. They give a larger forbidden region
   C. They do not radiate from open ends and are easy to tune with sliding shorts
   D. They halve the required spacing
   Answer: C. An open end radiates and has fringing; a shorted stub avoids this and can be adjusted by moving the short. (Key point: Why short stubs)

## Related in RF and Microwave Engineering

- [Double-stub matching 110+j110 Ω on 100 Ω line](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-110-j110) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Double-stub for inductive antenna load on 78 Ω line](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-inductive-load-78-ohm) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2
- [Double-stub tuner for 75+j75 Ω on 50 Ω line](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-tuner-75-j75) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2, asked 2×
- [Double-stub for 80+j180 Ω at 3 GHz](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-80-j180-3ghz) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2
- [Double-stub for 10 GHz antenna, Γ = 0.45∠60°](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-10ghz-antenna) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2
- [Double-stub with assumed load on 50 Ω line](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Frf_and_microwave_engineering%3Adouble-stub-arbitrary-load-50-ohm) — RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 2

## Related in other subjects

- [Impedance matching techniques](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_3%2Felectromagnetism%3Aimpedance-matching-quarter-wave-stub) — Electromagnetism, chapter 5, asked 3×
