---
title: "Design factors of rotary intersection"
subject: "Transportation Engineering II"
chapter: 1
key: "semester_7/transportation_engineering_ii:rotary-design-factors"
source: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_7/transportation_engineering_ii/rotary-design-factors
site: BCT Engineering
---

# Design factors of rotary intersection

Transportation Engineering II · Chapter 1: Traffic Engineering

- Asked in: 2078 Bhadra, 8 marks
- Video: [Lec-21 Guidelines for Rotary Intersection 1| Traffic Engineering and Management | Civil Engineering](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mco1FgsYkac) — Civil Engineering Department_LJIET
- Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort) on 2026-10-14
- Page: https://www.bctengineer.com/q/semester_7/transportation_engineering_ii/rotary-design-factors
- Whole chapter: https://www.bctengineer.com/md/semester_7/transportation_engineering_ii/chapter-1

## Question

Explain the design factors to be considered in rotary intersection design.

## Short answer

Key factors are design speed, central island radius, entry and exit curve radii, weaving length and width, carriageway width, entry and non-weaving widths, central island shape, proportion of weaving traffic, superelevation, sight distance, and channelising islands.

## Answer

**Design elements/factors for a rotary (IRC:65-1976, Recommended Practice for Traffic Rotaries)**

1. **Design speed:** 30 km/h for urban and 40 km/h for rural rotaries (IRC:65).
2. **Radius of the central island and entry/exit curves:** the central island radius is about 1.33 times the entry curve radius (IRC:65); the entry curve radius is about 20 m (urban) to 25 m (rural); exit curves are about 1.5 to 2 times the entry curve radius, to speed up exits.
3. **Weaving length and width:** the weaving length between the entry and exit of consecutive arms should be at least 4 times the weaving width (IRC:65), and is checked so that $w/l$ lies between 0.12 and 0.4 for the capacity formula.
4. **Width of the rotary carriageway:** the width of the weaving section is the average of the entry width and the non-weaving width plus 3.5 m ($w = (e_1 + e_2)/2 + 3.5$ m); minimum 7 m for a rotary on two-lane approaches.
5. **Entry and exit widths:** the entry width $e_1$ and non-weaving width $e_2$ are provided to suit the approach carriageways, keeping $e/w$ between 0.4 and 1.0.
6. **Shape of the central island:** circular (preferred), elliptical, tangent or turbine shapes to suit the angles of the approach roads.
7. **Traffic volume and proportion of weaving traffic:** the capacity formula depends on this proportion $p$ (0.4-1.0).
8. **Super-elevation and cross slope:** the carriageway is given a reverse camber of about 1.5 to 2 percent (cross fall outward) for drainage; no superelevation inwards.
9. **Sight distance** at entries and in the circulating carriageway.
10. **Channelising islands, pedestrian refuges, markings, signs and lighting.**

**Capacity check:** the practical capacity of the weaving section (IRC:65, Wardrop/TRRL formula) is

$$
Q_p = \frac{280\,w\left(1+\dfrac{e}{w}\right)\left(1-\dfrac{p}{3}\right)}{1+\dfrac{w}{l}}\ \text{PCU/h}
$$

where $e = (e_1+e_2)/2$, $w$ = weaving width (m), $l$ = weaving length (m), and $p$ = proportion of weaving traffic to total traffic in the weaving section. The formula is valid when $0.4 \le e/w \le 1.0$, $0.12 \le w/l \le 0.4$, $0.4 \le p \le 1.0$ and $w$ lies between 6 and 18 m.

## Check yourself

The answer's key points as multiple-choice questions, with the correct option and why.

1. According to the answer (IRC:65), what design speeds are adopted for rotaries?
   A. 60 km/h urban and 80 km/h rural
   B. 30 km/h urban and 40 km/h rural
   C. 40 km/h urban and 30 km/h rural
   D. 20 km/h urban and 20 km/h rural
   Answer: B. IRC:65 takes about 30 km/h for urban and 40 km/h for rural rotaries. (Key point: Design speed)

2. What is the minimum weaving length relative to the weaving width?
   A. Equal to the weaving width
   B. 2 times the weaving width
   C. At least 4 times the weaving width
   D. 10 times the weaving width
   Answer: C. IRC:65 requires weaving length of at least 4 times the weaving width, with w/l between 0.12 and 0.4. (Key point: Weaving length)

3. How is the width of the weaving section obtained?
   A. w = e1 + e2
   B. w = (e1 + e2)/2 + 3.5 m
   C. w = (e1 + e2)/2 - 3.5 m
   D. w = 3.5 m fixed
   Answer: B. The weaving width is the mean entry width plus 3.5 m, with a minimum of 7 m. (Key point: Weaving width)

4. In the practical capacity formula, which quantity do the limits 0.4 to 1.0 apply to besides e/w?
   A. Proportion p of weaving traffic
   B. Ratio w/l
   C. Central island radius ratio
   D. Cross fall
   Answer: A. The formula is valid for 0.4 <= e/w <= 1.0, 0.12 <= w/l <= 0.4 and 0.4 <= p <= 1.0. (Key point: Capacity formula limits)

## Related in Transportation Engineering II

- [At-grade intersection requirements; rotary design steps](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Aintersection-requirements-rotary-design-steps) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 1
- [Traffic capacity types; rotary intersection sketch](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Atraffic-capacity-types-rotary-sketch) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 1
- [Rotary intersection: advantages and disadvantages](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Arotary-definition-advantages-disadvantages) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 1
- [Spot speed study methods and rotary limitations](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Aspot-speed-methods-rotary-advantages) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 1
- [Pavement design factors in AASHTO method](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Apavement-design-factors-aashto) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 2
- [Factors affecting pavement design](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Ftransportation_engineering_ii%3Apavement-design-factors) — Transportation Engineering II, chapter 2, asked 3×

## Related in other subjects

- [Define hill road and design factors](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_6%2Ftransportation_engineering_i%3Ahill-define-factors) — Transportation Engineering I, chapter 5, asked 2×
- [Factors for electric heating in building design](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_7%2Futilization_of_electrical_energy%3Aelectric-heating-building-design-factors) — Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 5
- [Principles of mix design; factors not in DOE](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Fconcrete_technology_and_masonry_structure%3Amix-design-principles-doe-omitted) — Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 3
- [Factors in design of masonry](https://www.bctengineer.com/question.md?key=semester_5%2Fconcrete_technology_and_masonry_structure%3Amasonry-design-factors) — Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 8
