Skip to main content

Fire tube versus water tube boilers

Short answer

In fire-tube boilers, hot gases flow through tubes surrounded by water; they produce low-to-medium pressure steam slowly, e.g., Lancashire, Cochran. In water-tube boilers, water flows inside tubes with hot gases outside; they deliver high-pressure steam quickly and are more compact, e.g., Babcock and Wilcox, Stirling.

Differentiate between fire tube boilers and water tube boilers, giving two examples of each.

In a fire tube boiler the hot flue gases pass through tubes surrounded by water. In a water tube boiler water flows inside the tubes and the hot gases pass outside them.

PointFire tube boilerWater tube boiler
Hot gasesInside the tubesOutside the tubes
WaterOutside the tubes, in the shellInside the tubes
Steam pressureLow to medium, up to about 25 barHigh, up to 100 bar and above
Steam capacityLimited, up to about 10 t/hLarge, up to several hundred t/h
Steam raisingSlow, large water contentQuick, small water content
Explosion riskSerious, large water volumeLess serious, small drum and tubes
Floor space for same outputMoreLess
Cost and transportCheaper, simple, easy to installCostlier, erected at site
Water qualityTolerates poor feed waterNeeds well-treated water
Response to load changePoorGood
Cleaning and inspectionEasy internallyTubes are cleaned individually, harder

Examples: Fire tube: Lancashire, Cornish, Cochran, locomotive boiler. Water tube: Babcock and Wilcox, Stirling, Yarrow.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Applied Thermodynamics chapter 1 questions →