Skip to main content

Cipolletti weir slope and approach velocity

Short answer

The sides lopes of a Cipolletti weir compensate for end contractions; equating the triangular discharge to the loss gives tanθ = 1/4, i.e., 1 horizontal to 4 vertical. Velocity of approach is accounted by adding the velocity head ha = Va²/(2g) to the weir head, using effective head H+ha, and solving iteratively.

Show that the slope of Cipolletti weir is 1:4. How can you account for velocity of approach while computing the discharge over weirs?

Slope of Cipolletti weir is 1 horizontal : 4 vertical

A Cipolletti weir is a trapezoidal weir whose side slopes are chosen so that the extra discharge through the two triangular ends makes up for the reduction in discharge caused by the end contractions of a rectangular weir.

Let LL be the crest length, HH the head, and θ\theta the angle of the side slope with the vertical.

Rectangular weir with two end contractions (Francis):

Q1=23Cd2g (L−0.1×2H)H3/2Q_1 = \frac{2}{3}C_d\sqrt{2g}\,(L - 0.1\times 2H)H^{3/2}

Rectangular weir without end contractions:

Q0=23Cd2g LH3/2Q_0 = \frac{2}{3}C_d\sqrt{2g}\,LH^{3/2}

so the loss due to the contractions is

Q0−Q1=23Cd2g (0.2H)H3/2Q_0 - Q_1 = \frac{2}{3}C_d\sqrt{2g}\,(0.2H)H^{3/2}

Discharge through the two triangular ends (together they form one triangular notch of half-angle θ\theta):

Q2=815Cd2gtan⁡θ H5/2Q_2 = \frac{8}{15}C_d\sqrt{2g}\tan\theta\,H^{5/2}

For a Cipolletti weir, Q2=Q0−Q1Q_2 = Q_0 - Q_1:

815tan⁡θ H5/2=23(0.2)H5/2  ⇒  tan⁡θ=0.1333×158=0.25\frac{8}{15}\tan\theta\,H^{5/2} = \frac{2}{3}(0.2)H^{5/2}\;\Rightarrow\;\tan\theta = \frac{0.1333\times 15}{8} = 0.25

So tan⁡θ=14\tan\theta = \dfrac{1}{4}: 1 horizontal to 4 vertical (θ=14.04∘\theta = 14.04^\circ from the vertical).

The discharge is then Q=23CdL2g H3/2Q = \dfrac{2}{3}C_d L\sqrt{2g}\,H^{3/2} (with LL the base length), with no correction for end contractions.

Velocity of approach

The velocity of approach Va=Q/AchannelV_a = Q/A_{channel} adds a velocity head ha=Va2/2gh_a = V_a^2/2g to the head over the weir, so the effective head is H+haH + h_a:

Q=23CdL2g[(H+ha)3/2−ha3/2]Q = \frac{2}{3}C_dL\sqrt{2g}\left[(H + h_a)^{3/2} - h_a^{3/2}\right]

(For a triangular notch, Q=815Cdtan⁡θ22g[(H+ha)5/2−ha5/2]Q = \dfrac{8}{15}C_d\tan\dfrac{\theta}{2}\sqrt{2g}\left[(H + h_a)^{5/2} - h_a^{5/2}\right].) Since VaV_a depends on QQ, solve by trial: first find QQ ignoring hah_a, then find Va=Q/AV_a = Q/A and hah_a, and recompute QQ; repeat until it converges. If hah_a is negligible (a large approach channel), simply use Q=23CdL2g H3/2Q = \tfrac23 C_d L\sqrt{2g}\,H^{3/2}.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Fluid Mechanics chapter 6 questions →