- 2068 Baisakh (old course) · 8 marks
Hollow section replacing solid compression member
Short answer
Equating cross-sectional areas gives outer diameter 83.3 mm and inner diameter 66.7 mm.
A solid circular compression member 50mm in diameter is to be replaced by a hollow circular section of the same material. Find the size of the hollow section, if internal diameter is 0.8 times the external diameter.
Condition: the hollow member must carry the same axial load as the solid one with the same material and the same stress, so the cross-sectional area must be equal. Let the hollow section have outer diameter and inner diameter .
Equating areas:
Wall thickness mm.
Comparison (why the hollow section is better in compression)
| Property | Solid | Hollow |
|---|---|---|
| Area (mm²) | 1963.5 | 1963.5 |
| (mm⁴) | ||
| (mm) | 12.50 | 26.68 |
For the same weight, the hollow section has a much larger moment of inertia and radius of gyration, so its slenderness ratio is smaller and it resists buckling better.
Answer: outer diameter mm and inner diameter mm.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Torsion vs bending; hollow shaft replaced by solid · Strength of Materials, chapter 6
- Solid shaft 300 kW; hollow shaft saving · Strength of Materials, chapter 6
- Hollow shaft stronger than solid shaft (same weight) · Strength of Materials, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Torsional rigidity; hollow shaft vs solid shaft strength · Strength of Materials, chapter 6
- Hollow shaft 1670 kW at 4500 rpm: size · Strength of Materials, chapter 6
- Solid shaft 120 Nm: diameter from limits · Strength of Materials, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Hollow shaft against solid shaft · Machine Design I, chapter 5
- Page size impact; internal, external fragmentation · Operating System, chapter 4
- Hollow versus solid shaft for power · Strength of Materials, chapter 4
- Double angle tension member, M18, same side · Design of Steel and Timber Structure, chapter 5