- 2069 Bhadra · 8 marks
Induction: n < 2^n
Short answer
Base case n=1: 1<2 holds. Assume k < 2^k. Then k+1 < 2^k + 1 ≤ 2^k + 2^k = 2^(k+1). Thus by mathematical induction, n < 2^n for all positive integers n.
Use mathematical induction to prove the inequality n < 2^n for all positive integers n.
To prove. P(n): n < 2ⁿ for all positive integers n.
Basis step (n = 1)
1 < 2¹ = 2, which is true. So P(1) holds.
Inductive hypothesis
Assume P(k) is true for some k ≥ 1: k < 2ᵏ.
Inductive step
Show P(k+1): k + 1 < 2ᵏ⁺¹.
- From the hypothesis, k < 2ᵏ. Add 1 to both sides: k + 1 < 2ᵏ + 1.
- Since k ≥ 1, 2ᵏ ≥ 2 > 1, so 1 < 2ᵏ, giving 2ᵏ + 1 < 2ᵏ + 2ᵏ.
- Therefore k + 1 < 2ᵏ + 2ᵏ = 2·2ᵏ = 2ᵏ⁺¹.
So P(k+1) is true.
Conclusion
By mathematical induction, n < 2ⁿ for every positive integer n. ∎
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Induction: sum of cubes · Discrete Structure, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Induction: sum of squares · Discrete Structure, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Induction: 3+3·5+3·5²+...+3·5^n · Discrete Structure, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Induction: sum of geometric progression · Discrete Structure, chapter 1
- Weak induction; 5^n − 1 divisible by 4 · Discrete Structure, chapter 1
- Induction: sum of n(n+1)(n+2) · Discrete Structure, chapter 1
- Prove positive XOR equals negative XNOR · Digital Logic, chapter 2 · asked 3×
- Induction: 5^n − 1 divisible by 4 · Theory of Computation, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Induction: sum of k·k! = (n+1)!−1 · Theory of Computation, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Induction: n⁴ − 4n² divisible by 3 · Theory of Computation, chapter 1 · asked 2×