- 2069 Bhadra · 8 marks
No-load and blocked rotor tests of induction motor
Short answer
No-load test runs motor at rated voltage unloaded, measuring Po, Io, Vo to find core-loss resistance Rc and magnetizing reactance Xm after subtracting copper losses. Blocked-rotor test applies reduced voltage to pass rated current with rotor stalled, giving total leakage impedance Zeq=R1+R2' and Xeq=X1+X2'; R1 from DC test. These form the per-phase equivalent circuit.
Explain the no-load test and blocked rotor test of a three-phase induction motor. How the data obtained from these tests can be used to calculate the equivalent circuit parameters of the motor?
The no-load test and the blocked rotor test of a three-phase induction motor are the counterparts of the open-circuit and short-circuit tests of a transformer. Together they give the parameters of the per-phase equivalent circuit () without loading the motor.
Circuit used
3-ph +--[A]--[W1]--+
variable --| |--- 3-ph
supply ---+--[ ]--[W2]--+--- induction
(autotr.) | [V] |--- motor
+-------------+
Two-wattmeter method: P = W1 + W2
An ammeter, a voltmeter and two wattmeters (two-wattmeter method) are connected between a variable three-phase supply (autotransformer) and the stator.
No-load test
Procedure: The motor runs uncoupled from any load at rated voltage and rated frequency. Readings: line voltage , line current and input power .
Theory: At no load the slip is very small (), so is very large and the rotor branch is practically open. The current (25–40 % of rated, because of the air gap) is mainly magnetising current. Input power covers:
Calculations (per phase, star equivalent):
Also , so a more accurate value is once is known from the blocked rotor test. Friction and windage loss can be separated from core loss by repeating the test at reduced voltages and extrapolating the – curve to zero voltage.
Blocked rotor test
Procedure: The rotor is held stationary (blocked) and a reduced voltage (about 10–20 % of rated) is applied, raised until rated current flows. Readings: , , . For accurate rotor values, the test is ideally done at about 25 % of rated frequency, since the rotor normally works at slip frequency.
Theory: With the rotor at rest, , so is small. The magnetising branch has a much higher impedance and, at low voltage, draws very little current; it is neglected. Core loss is negligible at low voltage and there is no mechanical loss, so is almost entirely the full-load copper loss of stator and rotor.
Calculations (per phase):
is measured by a DC test on the stator winding (DC resistance multiplied by about 1.2 for skin effect; for a star winding, ).
Splitting : Usually (IEEE gives other ratios, e.g. 0.4 : 0.6 for class B and 0.3 : 0.7 for class C designs).
Using the results: equivalent circuit
R1 jX1 jX2' R2'
-^^^---mmm----+------mmm------^^^--+
| | |
V1 Rc[] []jXm [] R2'(1-s)/s
| | | (load)
--------------+------+-------------+
| Parameter | Obtained from |
|---|---|
| DC resistance test | |
| Blocked rotor test minus | |
| Blocked rotor test ( split) | |
| No-load test () | |
| No-load test () | |
| Rotational loss | No-load test |
With these values the equivalent circuit can predict current, power factor, torque, efficiency and slip at any load, and the data can also be used to draw the circle diagram.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Induction motor equivalent circuit from no-load and blocked rotor tests · Electrical Machines I, chapter 5
- Induction motor equivalent circuit from two-wattmeter tests · Electrical Machines I, chapter 5
- Determining single phase IM equivalent circuit parameters · Electric Machines II, chapter 3