- 2081 Chaitra · 5 marks
Slope stability: N40W/55 slope, two joints
Short answer
Plot the great circles and friction circle on a lower-hemisphere equal-angle stereonet. J1 (37/220) daylights and dips more than 28°, so plane failure is possible; J1-J2 intersection plunges 36.4° toward 232°, within the face, so wedge failure is also possible. The slope is unstable.
A rock slope has orientation of N40°W/55° exposed with two sets of joints with attitudes of N50°W/37° and N70°E/67°. The friction angle of discontinuity is 28°. Describe the stability condition of the rock slope by stereographic projection of the discontinuities.
Method (lower-hemisphere stereonet, equal-angle): plot the great circle of the slope face and of each discontinuity, draw the friction circle of radius , and mark intersections of great circles. Then apply the kinematic tests below.
Data and assumptions
Slope face N40°W/55° dips south-west, so it is taken as 55/230 (dip/dip direction). Joint set 1 N50°W/37° dips SW: 37/220. Joint set 2 N70°E/67° dips SE: 67/160. .
Individual planes
| Plane (dip/dip dir) | Diff. of dip dir from slope | Daylights () | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1 (37/220) | 10° | yes | yes | Plane failure |
| J2 (67/160) | 70° | no | yes | Safe |
Intersection of the joint sets
| Pair | Intersection plunge/trend | Face apparent dip along trend | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| J1 x J2 | 36.4° / 232° | 55.0° | Wedge failure |
Result
- J1 strikes almost parallel to the face (10° difference), daylights () and dips more than (), so plane failure along J1 is possible.
- J2 is steeper than the face (), so it alone cannot slide.
- J1 and J2 form a wedge whose line plunges towards , within the face (apparent dip of face ) and above , so wedge failure is also possible.
Conclusion: the slope is unstable (plane failure along J1 and wedge failure along J1-J2). To stabilise it, flatten the cut to below about (less than the intersection plunge and the J1 dip ), or use rock bolts, drainage and benching.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Cut slope design: N41W/56 hillslope · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Stereographic projection and its uses · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6 · asked 4×
- Canal slope stability: HS 138/45 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Stability: HS 175/52, BP 150/48 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Cut slope design: quartzite N55W/50 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Cut slope design: limestone N48E/52 · Engineering Geology II, chapter 6
- Slope orientation and discontinuities for stability · Engineering Geology I, chapter 6
- Compare two S-matrix sets; stability and gains · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 6
- Planes of discontinuity in rock masses · Engineering Geology I, chapter 5
- Preventive measures for landslide and rock slope · Engineering Geology I, chapter 6 · asked 4×