Skip to main content

Economical trapezoid and power saving

Short answer

Most economical trapezoidal section (2:1 side slope) for Q=9 m³/s has depth 2.20 m, bed width 1.04 m, slope 1 in 3236. A rectangular channel 1.2 m deep by 3 m wide requires a much steeper slope, resulting in a power saving of about 565 kW per km.

Determine the most economical section of a trapezoidal channel with side slope of 2:1, carrying a discharge of 9 m³/s with a velocity of 0.75 m/s. Take Manning's n = 0.025. For conveying the same discharge, if a rectangular channel 1.2 m deep and 3 m wide is provided, what would be the saving in power per km length of channel?

Reading: side slope 2:12:1 is taken as 2 horizontal to 1 vertical (z=2z=2).

Given data

Q=9Q=9 m³/s, V=0.75V=0.75 m/s, n=0.025n=0.025.

Most economical trapezoid

A=QV=90.75=12 m2A=\frac QV=\frac{9}{0.75}=12\ \text{m}^2 A=y2(21+z2−z)=y2(25−2)=2.4721 y2  ⇒  y=122.4721=2.203 mA=y^2\left(2\sqrt{1+z^2}-z\right)=y^2(2\sqrt5-2)=2.4721\,y^2\;\Rightarrow\;y=\sqrt{\frac{12}{2.4721}}=2.203\ \text{m} b=2y(5−2)=2×2.203×0.2361=1.040 m,R=y2=1.102 mb=2y(\sqrt5-2)=2\times2.203\times0.2361=1.040\ \text{m},\qquad R=\frac y2=1.102\ \text{m}

Bed slope from Manning's equation:

St=(nVR2/3)2=(0.025×0.751.1022/3)2=3.090×10−4(1 in 3236)S_t=\left(\frac{nV}{R^{2/3}}\right)^2=\left(\frac{0.025\times0.75}{1.102^{2/3}}\right)^2=3.090\times10^{-4}\quad(\text{1 in }3236)

Rectangular channel 3 m wide, 1.2 m deep, same Q=9Q=9 m³/s

Ar=3.6 m2,Vr=93.6=2.5 m/s,Pr=3+2(1.2)=5.4 m,Rr=3.65.4=0.6667 mA_r=3.6\ \text{m}^2,\quad V_r=\frac{9}{3.6}=2.5\ \text{m/s},\quad P_r=3+2(1.2)=5.4\ \text{m},\quad R_r=\frac{3.6}{5.4}=0.6667\ \text{m} Sr=(nVrRr2/3)2=(0.025×2.50.66672/3)2=6.707×10−3(1 in 149)S_r=\left(\frac{nV_r}{R_r^{2/3}}\right)^2=\left(\frac{0.025\times2.5}{0.6667^{2/3}}\right)^2=6.707\times10^{-3}\quad(\text{1 in }149)

Power

For the same discharge, the power lost per unit length is γQSf\gamma QS_f (the head loss per unit length is SfS_f). Over 1 km:

Ptrap=γQStL=9.81×9×3.090×10−4×1000=27.28 kWP_{trap}=\gamma Q S_t L=9.81\times9\times3.090\times10^{-4}\times1000=27.28\ \text{kW} Prect=9.81×9×6.707×10−3×1000=592.19 kWP_{rect}=9.81\times9\times6.707\times10^{-3}\times1000=592.19\ \text{kW} Saving=Prect−Ptrap=564.9 kW per km\text{Saving}=P_{rect}-P_{trap}=564.9\ \text{kW per km}

Equivalently, the rectangular channel needs 6.71 m of fall per km, against 0.31 m for the economical trapezoid.

Answer: economical section y=2.20y=2.20 m, b=1.04b=1.04 m (bed slope 1 in 3236); saving in power ≈565\approx565 kW per km.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Hydraulics chapter 6 questions →