- 2072 Asoj · 4+2 marks
Economical trapezoid and power saving
Short answer
Most economical trapezoidal section (2:1 side slope) for Q=9 m³/s has depth 2.20 m, bed width 1.04 m, slope 1 in 3236. A rectangular channel 1.2 m deep by 3 m wide requires a much steeper slope, resulting in a power saving of about 565 kW per km.
Determine the most economical section of a trapezoidal channel with side slope of 2:1, carrying a discharge of 9 m³/s with a velocity of 0.75 m/s. Take Manning's n = 0.025. For conveying the same discharge, if a rectangular channel 1.2 m deep and 3 m wide is provided, what would be the saving in power per km length of channel?
Reading: side slope is taken as 2 horizontal to 1 vertical ().
Given data
m³/s, m/s, .
Most economical trapezoid
Bed slope from Manning's equation:
Rectangular channel 3 m wide, 1.2 m deep, same m³/s
Power
For the same discharge, the power lost per unit length is (the head loss per unit length is ). Over 1 km:
Equivalently, the rectangular channel needs 6.71 m of fall per km, against 0.31 m for the economical trapezoid.
Answer: economical section m, m (bed slope 1 in 3236); saving in power kW per km.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Most economical trapezoid of area 40 m² · Hydraulics, chapter 6
- Economical trapezoid for given velocity · Hydraulics, chapter 6
- Derive most economical rectangular section · Hydraulics, chapter 6
- GVF in 12 m wide channel, 2 steps · Hydraulics, chapter 8
- Half-hexagon channel dimensions and Manning n · Hydraulics, chapter 6
- Bresse's method for 20 m wide channel · Hydraulics, chapter 8
- Economical rectangular condition and trapezoidal bed slope · Hydro Power, chapter 1
- Most economical trapezoidal channel of area 50 m² · Hydro Power, chapter 1
- Most economical rectangular channel section · Hydro Power, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Economical trapezoidal channel side length · Hydro Power, chapter 1