- Asked 2/32
- 2081 Baisakh · 6 marks
- 2076 Ashwin · 6 marks
UPV and rebound hammer tests
Short answer
The rebound hammer test strikes the surface with a spring-loaded mass; rebound number R correlates with hardness and strength. Take 9-12 readings, discard those beyond +/-6 from mean, and average; read strength from calibration curve. The UPV test measures pulse velocity V = L/T; direct transmission is best. Quality per IS 13311: >4.5 km/s excellent, 3.5-4.5 good, 3.0-3.5 medium, <3.0 doubtful. Strength estimated with +/-20% accuracy.
Explain the Rebound Hammer test and the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity test (procedure for both tests in concrete).
Rebound hammer (Schmidt hammer) test (IS 13311 Part 2)
Principle: a spring-loaded mass strikes the concrete surface through a plunger. The rebound of the mass, read as the rebound number on a scale of 10 to 100, depends on the surface hardness, which is related to strength.
Procedure
- Select a smooth, clean, dry surface of a structural member at least 100 mm thick; grind off plaster, loose scale and rough texture.
- Hold the hammer at right angles to the surface (a horizontal shot is the reference; shots vertically up or down need an orientation correction), push the plunger until the mass is released, and read the rebound number.
- Take about 9 to 12 readings at spots 20 to 50 mm apart; reject readings that differ from the mean by more than 6 units, and average the rest.
- Read the compressive strength from the manufacturer's calibration curve (for the position of the hammer), which should preferably be made from cubes of the same concrete.
Precautions: avoid edges, honeycombed and wet surfaces, and spots over reinforcement; the instrument should be checked on the test anvil.
Limits: it tests only the surface (about 30 mm), so it is affected by carbonation, moisture, surface finish, type of aggregate and cement, and age. Accuracy of strength is about ±15 to 25%. It is useful for comparing uniformity and for choosing places for coring or UPV.
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test (IS 13311 Part 1)
Principle: the velocity of an ultrasonic pulse through concrete depends on its density and elastic properties. Sound, dense concrete transmits the pulse faster than porous or cracked concrete.
Apparatus: pulse generator and receiver with two transducers (usually 54 kHz), a timer reading to 0.1 microsecond, a coupling gel, and a reference calibration bar.
Procedure
- Calibrate the instrument on the reference bar.
- Clean the surface and apply grease or gel to ensure good acoustic contact.
- Put the transducers on the concrete, either directly (opposite faces, most reliable), semi-directly (adjacent faces) or indirectly (same face, least reliable).
- Measure the path length and the transit time .
- Calculate the velocity:
Take several readings and average them. Avoid paths parallel to reinforcement, as steel carries the pulse faster.
Quality of concrete (IS 13311 Part 1)
| Pulse velocity (km/s) | Quality |
|---|---|
| Above 4.5 | Excellent |
| 3.5 to 4.5 | Good |
| 3.0 to 3.5 | Medium |
| Below 3.0 | Doubtful (poor) |
Strength estimation: read from a calibration curve of against cube strength for the same mix; accuracy about ±20%.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Ultrasonic pulse velocity test · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5 · asked 2×
- NDT circumstances; ultrasonic pulse velocity test · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5
- Rebound hammer test · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5
- NDT importance; Schmidt hammer test · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5
- Precautions in Schmidt hammer test · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5
- Tensile tests; split test advantage; h/d ratio · Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure, chapter 5
- Ultrasonic pulse velocity and tomography tests · Design of Timber and Masonry Structures, chapter 8
- Marshall stability test procedure · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Procedure: test of significance of mean · Probability and Statistics, chapter 6
- Chi-square test of independence: 2×2 procedure · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
All Concrete Technology and Masonry Structure chapter 5 questions →