- 2081 Baisakh · 8 marks
Strip footing FOS, three water table cases
Short answer
Apply Terzaghi’s equation with water table corrections: for WT at 4 m (no effect) FOS=3.83; at 2.5 m (Rw2=0.825) FOS=3.52; at 0.5 m (γ'=9.69 kN/m³) FOS=2.57.
A strip footing 2 m wide carries a safe load intensity of at a depth of 1.2 m in cohesion less soil. Saturated unit weight and bulk unit weight are and respectively. Determine the value of FOS with respect to shear failure for following conditions of water table. Use , and . (i) WT at 4 m below GL (ii) WT at 2.5 m below GL (iii) WT at 0.5 m below GL.
Given: strip footing m, m, (cohesionless), , , applied pressure kN/m², kN/m³, kN/m³, kN/m³. FOS . Strip footing: .
(i) WT at 4 m below GL
The water table is m below the base, greater than m, so it has no effect.
(ii) WT at 2.5 m below GL
m below the base (), so . The surcharge is unchanged ().
(iii) WT at 0.5 m below GL
The water table is above the base. kN/m³.
Answer: FOS = 3.83 (WT at 4 m), 3.52 (WT at 2.5 m) and 2.57 (WT at 0.5 m). A rising water table lowers the factor of safety.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Rectangular footing 3 m × 4 m, water table cases · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6
- Circular footing on stiff clay, water table · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6
- Strip footing, change in capacity with water rise · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Square footing under eccentric load, min depth · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6
- Footing 2 m × 3 m, eccentric in X and Y · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6
- Circular footing depth, 2000 kN · Foundation Engineering, chapter 6
- Uniform sand, water table 2 m, capillary · Soil Mechanics, chapter 6
- Footing, 1250 kN column load, depth 1.8 m · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 11
- Strip footing vs 2:1 method · Soil Mechanics, chapter 8
- Infinite slope FoS; water table rises · Soil Mechanics, chapter 11