Skip to main content

Case study: revamping MBI system for CEO

Short answer

Microcontroller-based system with PT100/amplifier, 12-bit ADC, SSR-driven steam valve, RS-485 Modbus SCADA. Resolution 0.037°C, control band 72.5–74°C. Advantages: ±0.5°C accuracy, 8% steam saving, labour reduction; investment Rs 12,00,000, payback 10.4 months.

Suppose, the CEO of the company where you performed your case study is impressed with your case study report, and decides to hire you as a consulting engineer to oversee their existing MBI system. You are assigned the task of revamping their existing MBI system with the blueprint that you have designed. Show a well labeled, clear and detailed sketch of your design that you will be presenting to the board of directors to convince them to implement your idea. Your block diagram and supporting documents should include a minimum of the following items: the hardware solution, the software requirements, the advantages and disadvantages of your own strategy, the gain in efficiency of the plant after employing your plan, and a cost breakdown of realizing your project.

Assumed case study: a milk pasteurisation and packaging section of a dairy plant (HTST process: raw milk tank, heat exchanger, steam-heated holding tube, cooling, filling). The existing system uses analog panel indicators, bimetal thermostats, a manual steam valve and operator logging. (If your own visit was to another plant, replace the process names; the structure of the answer stays the same.)

Proposed design (blueprint for the board)

 PT100 --> Amp/SigCond --+
 Level sensor ----------+--> MUX/ADC (12-bit)
 Flow sensor ---(pulse)-+         |
 Keypad ----------------+---> [Microcontroller] <--> LCD 16x2
                               |  ARM/AVR + flash   |
   Opto + SSR/relay <----------+  watchdog, timers  +--> RS-485
     |                         |                          (Modbus)
 Pump / steam valve / alarm    +--> EEPROM log         PC / SCADA
 Power supply: 24 V + 5 V + UPS

Hardware solution

A microcontroller board (12-bit ADC, UART, timers, watchdog), PT100 sensors with an amplifier, level and flow sensors, optocoupler plus SSR/relay drivers for the pumps and steam valve, a 16x2 LCD and keypad, an RS-485 link to a PC, a 24 V/5 V power supply with UPS, and an enclosure (IP54) with grounding and surge protection.

Software requirements

Firmware in C: ADC acquisition and filtering, PID/hysteresis control, alarm and interlock logic, keypad/LCD menu, Modbus RTU communication, data logging and watchdog. PC side: SCADA/HMI screens with trends, alarms and reports (for example an open-source or vendor package).

Key figures (calculated): a PT100 amplifier scaled 0-150 C to 0-5 V and a 12-bit ADC give a resolution of 150/4096 = 0.037 C per count (1.22 mV per count at 5 V), enough for the ±0.5 C pasteurisation limit. An 8-byte Modbus-style frame at 9600 baud takes 8 × 10 bits / 9600 = 8.3 ms, so every point can be updated several times per second.

Advantages

Accurate and stable temperature, quality and traceability, savings in steam, labour and rejects, remote monitoring, and easy expansion.

Disadvantages

Upfront cost, the need for training, sensitivity to electrical noise and power quality, software maintenance, and dependence on spares.

Gain in efficiency (assumed)

The temperature swing reduces from ±3 C to ±0.5 C; steam saving is about 8 percent; rejects fall from 1.5 percent to 0.5 percent; and labour is reduced from 4 to 2 operators per shift.

Cost breakdown (assumed, Rs)

ItemCost
Controller panel and electronics3,00,000
Sensors (temperature, level, flow)2,00,000
Valves and actuators3,50,000
SCADA PC and software1,50,000
Installation and wiring1,50,000
Training and commissioning50,000
Total12,00,000

Cost-benefit (assumed figures): investment Rs 12,00,000 (controller panel, sensors, valves, SCADA PC, installation, training). Monthly savings: manpower Rs 60,000, steam/energy Rs 35,000, reduced rejection Rs 20,000 = Rs 1,15,000. Payback = 12,00,000 / 1,15,000 ≈ 10.4 months; yearly return = 13.8 lakh on 12 lakh, about 115 percent.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5

All Instrumentation II chapter 10 questions →