- 2079 Chaitra · 3+2+5 marks
TDM vs FDM for voice; E1 and T1 hierarchies
Short answer
FDM assigns different frequency bands, TDM assigns time slots. For 24 voice channels, FDM-SSB needs 96 kHz, while T1 PCM needs 1.544 Mbps (~772 kHz Nyquist). E1 carries 30 voice at 2.048 Mbps with TS0/TS16 overhead, T1 carries 24 voice at 1.544 Mbps with a framing bit; E1 uses A-law, T1 µ-law.
Compare TDM and FDM. Show that for voice application. Compare E1 and T1 hierarchies.
Comparison of TDM and FDM
| Point | FDM | TDM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharing basis | Each signal gets its own frequency band | Each signal gets its own time slot |
| Time use | All signals sent at the same time | Signals sent one after another |
| Signal type | Mainly analog | Mainly digital (PAM/PCM samples) |
| Hardware | Modulators, sharp band-pass filters, oscillators per channel | Sampler, commutator, mostly digital circuits |
| Guard | Guard bands between channels | Guard times between slots |
| Crosstalk cause | Non-linearity, poor filters | Pulse spreading (ISI), poor sync |
| Synchronisation | Not critical | Frame sync is essential |
| Fading effect | Narrow-band fading hits only some channels | Fading during a slot hits one channel |
| Example | Radio/TV broadcast, old analog telephone trunks | T1/E1 digital telephony, GSM slots |
Voice application
The question asks for the comparison to be shown for voice channels. Take telephone channels, each band-limited to 3.4 kHz.
FDM (SSB, 4 kHz slot per channel including guard band):
TDM-PCM (8 kHz sampling, 8 bits/sample, T1 frame):
The minimum (Nyquist) bandwidth is kHz.
So for voice, FDM needs only about one-eighth of the bandwidth of TDM-PCM. TDM-PCM is still preferred because:
- regenerative repeaters remove noise at each hop,
- digital switching and circuits are cheap,
- it can carry speech and data together.
FDM was used in older analog trunks. TDM (T1/E1) is used in today's digital telephone networks.
Comparison of E1 and T1 hierarchies
| Point | T1 (North America, Japan) | E1 (Europe, ITU-T, Nepal) |
|---|---|---|
| Voice channels | 24 | 30 (+2 overhead slots) |
| Time slots per frame | 24 + 1 framing bit | 32 |
| Bits per frame | ||
| Frame duration | 125 µs | 125 µs |
| Bit rate | 1.544 Mb/s | 2.048 Mb/s |
| Framing | 1 F-bit per frame, pattern over 12/24 frames | TS0 carries frame alignment word |
| Signalling | Robbed-bit (LSB of frames 6 and 12) | Separate slot TS16 (CAS) |
| Multiframe | Superframe 12 frames / ESF 24 frames | 16 frames (2 ms) |
| Companding law | µ-law, | A-law, |
| Line code | AMI / B8ZS | HDB3 |
| Higher levels | 6.312, 44.736, 274.176 Mb/s | 8.448, 34.368, 139.264, 564.992 Mb/s |
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- T1 and E1 TDM-PCM hierarchy with frame diagrams · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- Constellation diagram significance; E1 vs T1 · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- Short note: FDM vs TDM · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- FDM vs TDM; FDM telephone hierarchy · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- FDMA vs TDMA; T1 and E1 hierarchy · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- E1 frame, TDM hierarchy and signaling rate · Communication Systems, chapter 5
- Compare FDM, WDM and TDM · Data Communication, chapter 6
- TDM and T1/E1 carrier standards · Telecommunications, chapter 3
- North American T1 vs European E1 hierarchy · Telecommunications, chapter 3 · asked 2×
- Comparison of FDM, TDM and WDM · Telecommunications, chapter 3 · asked 2×