- 2081 Bhadra · 4+4 marks
GOS and blocking probability in a loss system
Short answer
GoS is the measured fraction of calls lost in the busy hour. Blocking probability is the calculated probability all servers are busy (e.g., Erlang B). They guide dimensioning to meet a target GoS, split end-to-end loss budgets, balance cost and quality, and evaluate network performance.
Explain the Grade of Service (GOS) and Blocking Probability in the context of a loss system. How are these metrics used to design and evaluate telecommunication networks?
Grade of Service (GoS)
In a loss system (blocked calls cleared, no queue), GoS is the proportion of calls offered in the busy hour that are lost:
It is a measured value or design target set by the operator, e.g. 0.01 for trunk routes, and it describes the service seen by users over the whole network or a route.
Blocking probability
Blocking probability is the probability, calculated from a traffic model, that all N servers are busy when a call arrives. For Poisson traffic A offered to N trunks (Erlang B):
It has two forms: time congestion (fraction of time all servers are busy) and call congestion (fraction of calls lost). With infinite Poisson sources they are equal, so ; with finite sources (Engset), call congestion is less than time congestion.
| Point | GoS | Blocking probability |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Service quality measure / target | Probability from a model |
| Found by | Measurement of lost calls | Erlang B, Engset formula |
| Scope | Route, exchange or end to end | One server group |
| Use | Specify quality | Calculate trunks needed |
Use in design and evaluation
- Dimensioning: forecast the busy-hour traffic A, choose the GoS (e.g. 0.01), then find N from Erlang B tables. Example: A = 5 E with GoS 0.01 gives N = 11 trunks.
- End-to-end budget: a call through several links in tandem has a total GoS ≈ , so the overall target is split among the links (e.g. 0.002 per switch, 0.005 per trunk).
- Cost trade-off: a lower GoS needs more circuits; designers pick the GoS that balances cost and customer satisfaction.
- Routing design: high-usage direct routes are dimensioned for a high blocking value (large GoS) and overflow to a final route dimensioned for a low GoS.
- Evaluation: measured lost calls in the busy hour are compared with the target; if the target is exceeded, trunks are added or traffic is re-routed.
- Cellular planning: the number of channels per cell is chosen for 2% blocking.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- GOS vs blocking probability; E.164 plan · Telecommunications, chapter 6
- GOS vs blocking; 600 calls, 2.5 min · Telecommunications, chapter 6 · asked 6×
- Traffic intensity, GOS and call duration probability · Telecommunications, chapter 6
- Short note: Grade of service · Telecommunications, chapter 6
- GOS numerical: 1400 calls, 14 lost · Telecommunications, chapter 6 · asked 5×
- Traffic intensity, GOS and national numbering · Telecommunications, chapter 6
- Design metrics of embedded system · Embedded System, chapter 1 · asked 3×
- Numerical: 12-cell system capacity at 2% GOS · Wireless Communication, chapter 2
- Design goals and performance metrics · Computer Organization and Architecture, chapter 1
- GoS and optimal N for 15 dB S/I (n = 3) · Wireless Communication, chapter 2