- 2072 Asoj · 8 marks
AC vs DC transmission comparison
Short answer
HVAC uses three phases, has stability limits and charging current, suits short distances economically. HVDC uses two conductors, no line reactance or stability limit, lower line cost but high terminal cost. Break-even distance is ~500–800 km overhead; HVDC is superior for long bulk transfer and cables.
Make a detail technical and economic comparison of ac & dc transmission.
Both HVAC and HVDC are used for bulk power transfer. HVAC is the normal choice; HVDC becomes better for very long distances, submarine cables and asynchronous links.
Technical comparison
| Point | HVAC | HVDC |
|---|---|---|
| Conductors per circuit | 3 phases | 2 (bipolar) or 1 with earth return |
| Line reactance | Present; limits power () | No reactance in steady state |
| Stability limit | Falls with length | No stability limit on line length |
| Charging current | Large on long lines/cables | Nil |
| Skin effect, corona | Skin effect present; more corona | No skin effect; lower corona loss |
| Reactive power | Needs compensation for long lines | Converters need 50–60% reactive support |
| Asynchronous link | Not possible | Possible (50/60 Hz, or unsynchronised grids) |
| Power flow control | Indirect | Fast and accurate by converter control |
| Fault level | Interconnection raises SCMVA | Does not add fault current |
| Harmonics | Negligible | Converters produce harmonics; filters needed |
| Circuit breaking | Easy (current zero) | Difficult (no natural current zero) |
| Voltage transformation | Easy with transformers | Only at converter stations |
Economic comparison
- Line cost: HVDC line is cheaper: fewer conductors, smaller towers, narrower right-of-way, less insulation (peak = working voltage).
- Terminal cost: HVDC needs costly converter stations, filters, smoothing reactors and reactive support; HVAC terminals (transformers, switchgear) are cheaper.
- Losses: HVDC has lower line loss (no skin effect, less corona, no reactive current).
- Break-even distance: total cost lines cross at about 500–800 km for overhead lines and 30–50 km for underground/submarine cables. Below this HVAC is cheaper; above it HVDC is cheaper.
Cost
| AC total
| /
| / DC total
| / _/
| / _/
| DC_/_/ <- DC terminal cost
| _/ /
|/ / AC terminal cost
+----|-------------------> Distance
break-even (500-800 km)
Conclusion of comparison: HVAC suits short and medium distances and meshed grids with many tap points; HVDC suits long-distance bulk transfer, cables, and asynchronous interconnections.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- T/F: economic voltage vs number of circuits · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 2
- T/F: X/R ratio, transmission vs distribution · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 1
- Steps to choose economic voltage and circuits · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 2 · asked 3×
- T/F: switching surge ratio vs system voltage · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3 · asked 4×
- Underground vs overhead distribution systems · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 5 · asked 4×
- T/F: flashover voltage vs puncture voltage · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 3 · asked 3×
- Comparison of DC shunt and series generators · Electrical Machines I, chapter 3
- Why AC prevailed over DC in early 20th century · Power System Analysis I, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Advantages and limitations of DC transmission · Power System Analysis I, chapter 1
- DC vs AC electric traction systems · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 4
All Transmission and Distribution System Design chapter 1 questions →