Skip to main content

Short shunt compound generator with heater load

Short answer

Terminal voltage V=175×1.4=245 V; V_sh=262.5 V; I_sh=2.625 A; I_a=177.625 A. Generated emf E=262.5+177.625×15+4=2930.9 V. Copper loss total = 477011 W; electrical efficiency = 8.24%.

A short shunt compound dc generator supplies a load current of 175 A to a series of parallel heater load whose effective resistance is 1.4 Ω1.4\ \Omega. The generator has armature, series and shunt field resistances are 15 Ω15\ \Omega, 0.1 Ω0.1\ \Omega and 100 Ω100\ \Omega respectively. Calculate emf generated, copper losses and electrical efficiency of generator if carbon brush drop is 2 V per brush.

The heater load takes IL=175I_L = 175 A, so the terminal voltage follows from Ohm's law. In a short shunt machine the series field carries the load current and the shunt field is across the armature.

       Ia                 Rse   IL
  +--->---+----------+--[~~~]--->--+--o +
  |       |          |            |
 (E,Ra)   |        [Rsh]       Heaters
  |       |          |            |
  +-------+----------+------------+--o -

Terminal voltage

V=ILRL=175×1.4=245.0 VV = I_L R_L = 175 \times 1.4 = 245.0\ \text{V}

Shunt and armature currents

Vsh=V+ILRse=245.0+175(0.1)=262.5 VV_{sh} = V + I_LR_{se} = 245.0 + 175(0.1) = 262.5\ \text{V} Ish=VshRsh=262.5100=2.625 A,Ia=IL+Ish=177.625 AI_{sh} = \frac{V_{sh}}{R_{sh}} = \frac{262.5}{100} = 2.625\ \text{A}, \qquad I_a = I_L + I_{sh} = 177.625\ \text{A}

Generated emf

Brush drop =2 V×2=4 V= 2\ \text{V}\times 2 = 4\ \text{V}.

E=Vsh+IaRa+Vbrush=262.5+(177.625)(15)+4=2930.9 VE = V_{sh} + I_aR_a + V_{brush} = 262.5 + (177.625)(15) + 4 = 2930.9\ \text{V}

Copper losses

Pa=Ia2Ra=(177.625)2(15)=473259.6 WPse=IL2Rse=1752(0.1)=3062.5 WPsh=Ish2Rsh=(2.625)2(100)=689.1 WPcu=473259.6+3062.5+689.1=477011.2 W\begin{aligned} P_a &= I_a^2R_a = (177.625)^2(15) = 473259.6\ \text{W} \\ P_{se} &= I_L^2R_{se} = 175^2(0.1) = 3062.5\ \text{W} \\ P_{sh} &= I_{sh}^2R_{sh} = (2.625)^2(100) = 689.1\ \text{W} \\ P_{cu} &= 473259.6 + 3062.5 + 689.1 = 477011.2\ \text{W} \end{aligned}

Brush contact loss =VbrushIa=4×177.625=710.5 W= V_{brush}I_a = 4 \times 177.625 = 710.5\ \text{W}, so the total electrical loss is 477011.2+710.5=477721.7 W477011.2 + 710.5 = 477721.7\ \text{W}.

Electrical efficiency

Output=VIL=245.0×175=42875 W\text{Output} = VI_L = 245.0 \times 175 = 42875\ \text{W} Electrical power generated=EIa=2930.9×177.625=520596.7 W  (=42875+477721.7)\text{Electrical power generated} = EI_a = 2930.9 \times 177.625 = 520596.7\ \text{W} \;(= 42875 + 477721.7) ηelec=VILEIa=42875520596.7×100=8.24%\eta_{elec} = \frac{VI_L}{EI_a} = \frac{42875}{520596.7}\times 100 = 8.24\%

Answer: E=2930.9 VE = 2930.9\ \text{V}; copper loss =477011.2 W= 477011.2\ \text{W} (plus 710.5 W710.5\ \text{W} brush contact loss); electrical efficiency =8.24%= 8.24\%. (The armature resistance of 15 Ω15\ \Omega is used as given. It is almost certainly a misprint, since a practical armature resistance is a few hundredths of an ohm, which is why the emf is so high and the efficiency so low.)

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Electrical Machines chapter 3 questions →