Skip to main content

Flood statistics and exceedance probability, 2000-2009

Short answer

Sample mean = 40.17 m³/s, standard deviation = 10.63 m³/s, coefficient of skewness = 0.75. Probability of a 250 m³/s flood next year is ≈4.4×10⁻⁹ (practically zero).

Using given data for annual discharge in a section of a river from year 2000 to 2009.

(i) Calculate sample mean, sample standard deviation and sample coefficient of skewness.

(ii) What would be the probability of the flood of magnitude 250 m3^3/s occurring in the next year?

Year2000200120022003200420052006200720082009
Discharge (m3^3/s)33.931.731.559.650.538.643.428.732.051.8

Reduced mean yˉn=0.4952\bar{y}_n = 0.4952, Reduced Standard Deviation (σn)=0.9497(\sigma_n) = 0.9497.

(i) Statistics (n = 10)

Yearx (m³/s)x − mean(x − mean)²(x − mean)³
200033.9-6.2739.31-246.5
200131.7-8.4771.74-607.6
200231.5-8.6775.17-651.7
200359.619.43377.527335.3
200450.510.33106.711102.3
200538.6-1.572.46-3.9
200643.43.2310.4333.7
200728.7-11.47131.56-1509.0
200832.0-8.1766.75-545.3
200951.811.63135.261573.0
Sum401.70.001016.926480.3
xˉ=∑xn=401.710=40.17 m3/s\bar x=\frac{\sum x}{n}=\frac{401.7}{10}=40.17 \text{ m}^3/\text{s} s=∑(x−xˉ)2n−1=1016.929=10.63 m3/ss=\sqrt{\frac{\sum (x-\bar x)^2}{n-1}}=\sqrt{\frac{1016.92}{9}}=10.63 \text{ m}^3/\text{s} Cs=n∑(x−xˉ)3(n−1)(n−2) s3=10×6480.39×8×1201.1=0.75C_s=\frac{n\sum (x-\bar x)^3}{(n-1)(n-2)\,s^3}=\frac{10\times6480.3}{9\times 8\times1201.1}=0.75

Answer: mean = 40.17 m³/s, standard deviation = 10.63 m³/s, skewness coefficient = 0.75 (positively skewed).

(ii) Probability of a 250 m³/s flood next year (Gumbel)

K=250−40.1710.63=19.74K=\frac{250-40.17}{10.63}=19.74 yT=yˉn+Kσn=0.4952+19.74×0.9497=19.24y_T=\bar y_n+K\sigma_n = 0.4952 + 19.74\times0.9497=19.24 P(X≥250)=1−e−e−yT=1−e−e−19.24≈4.4×10−9P(X\ge 250)=1-e^{-e^{-y_T}}=1-e^{-e^{-19.24}} \approx 4.4\times10^{-9}

The return period is T=1/P≈2.3×108T=1/P \approx 2.3\times10^{8} years.

Answer: probability ≈ 4.4×10−94.4\times10^{-9} (about 4.4×10−74.4\times10^{-7} %), i.e. practically zero. The value is far outside the range of the 10-year record (maximum 59.6 m³/s), so it is a very large extrapolation.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5

All Engineering Hydrology chapter 6 questions →