- Asked 2/26
- 2082 Bhadra · 2+5 marks
- 2080 Baisakh · 3+4 marks
Ideal vs practical filters and scaling
Short answer
An ideal filter has flat passband gain, infinite stopband attenuation, vertical transition, and is non-causal. A practical filter exhibits passband ripple (αmax), finite stopband attenuation (αmin), a transition band, and is realizable with finite order. Magnitude scaling: R' = km·R, L' = km·L, C' = C/km. Frequency scaling: L' = L/kf, C' = C/kf, R' = R. Combined: R' = km·R, L' = (km/kf)·L, C' = C/(km·kf).
Compare and contrast between ideal and practical filters. Derive the necessary formulae for magnitude scaling and frequency scaling used in the design of a filter.
Ideal vs practical filters
An ideal filter passes all frequencies in the passband with constant gain and zero phase distortion and completely blocks all frequencies in the stopband, with a vertical edge between them. It cannot be built, because its impulse response is non-causal and infinitely long. A practical filter only approximates this.
| Ideal filter | Practical filter |
|---|---|
| Flat gain in passband | Gain varies within (ripple or droop) |
| Zero gain (infinite attenuation) in stopband | Finite attenuation, at least |
| No transition band (brick wall) | Transition band between and |
| Linear phase / constant delay | Non-linear phase, delay varies |
| Non-causal, not realizable | Causal, realizable with R, L, C, op-amps |
| Infinite order | Finite order |
|T| ideal |T| practical
1 +------+ 1 +~~~~~. <- ripple (amax)
| | | \
| | | \ transition
| | | `--..__ (amin)
0 +------+------> w 0 +------+---+------> w
wc wp ws
Magnitude (impedance) scaling
Every impedance in the network is multiplied by , at the same frequency. A voltage transfer function is a ratio of impedances, so it does not change.
Frequency scaling
The response at the old frequency must appear at the new frequency , where . So each element must have at the same impedance that the old element had at :
The new transfer function is : the response keeps its shape but is shifted along the frequency axis.
Combined scaling
Applying both:
Example: the normalized third-order Butterworth ladder (1 Ω, 1 H, 2 F, 1 H, 1 Ω, = 1 rad/s) scaled to rad/s () and 1 kΩ terminations () gives = 1 kΩ, H and F.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Ideal filter and magnitude/frequency scaling · Filter Design, chapter 1
- Filter importance in communication; ideal vs practical · Filter Design, chapter 1 · asked 2×
- Relevance of analog filters; frequency scaling · Filter Design, chapter 1
- Frequency scaling relations and filter design steps · Filter Design, chapter 1
- Frequency and magnitude scaling to 10⁵ rad/s · Filter Design, chapter 1
- Analog filter applications and element scaling · Filter Design, chapter 1
- Practical vs ideal transformer, phasor diagram · Electrical Machines, chapter 2
- Compare and contrast pollution in a city · Communication English, chapter 1
- Ideal low pass and high pass filters · Signals and Systems, chapter 5
- Ideal band pass and low pass filters (DT) · Signals and Systems, chapter 6