- 2080 Baisakh · 2 marks
Coulomb step ahead of Rankine
Short answer
Coulomb’s theory includes wall friction δ, adhesion, and allows inclined backfill and wall, giving a more realistic thrust direction. Rankine assumes a smooth vertical wall, horizontal or uniformly sloping backfill, and thrust parallel to the surface. Coulomb thus removes Rankine’s limitations for rough, inclined walls and irregular ground.
How is Coulomb's theory a step ahead of Rankine's theory for calculating earth pressure? Justify your answer in reference to the limitations of Rankine's theory.
Rankine's theory is limited because it assumes a smooth, vertical wall back (no wall friction), a horizontal or uniformly sloping backfill, and a thrust parallel to the backfill surface. It cannot deal with an inclined wall back, a broken ground surface or a rough wall, and its fixed thrust direction does not match the real direction on a rough wall.
Coulomb's wedge theory removes these limits:
- It includes wall friction () and wall adhesion, so the result is more realistic for rough concrete or masonry walls.
- It allows an inclined wall back and a sloping backfill.
- The thrust direction (at to the normal to the wall) is obtained, and loads such as surcharge and line loads can be included through the wedge weight (and the Culmann graphical method).
- It handles irregular ground surfaces.
Hence Coulomb's theory is more general and gives a more accurate active thrust, so it is a step ahead of Rankine's.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Rankine versus Coulomb theory · Foundation Engineering, chapter 3 · asked 3×
- Earth pressure coefficients and types · Foundation Engineering, chapter 3 · asked 2×
- Wall movement versus earth pressure plot · Foundation Engineering, chapter 3
- Limitations of Mohr-Coulomb theory · Soil Mechanics, chapter 10
- Theory of filtration and its limitations · Water Supply Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Limitations of Townsend theory; Paschen's law · High Voltage Engineering, chapter 6
- Applications and limitations of hydrograph theory · Engineering Hydrology, chapter 5