- 2076 Asoj · 5 marks
Test of proportion: drug test failure rate
Short answer
For H0:p=0.058 versus H1:p<0.058, p-hat=58/1520=0.0382, z=(0.0382-0.058)/0.006=-3.31. Critical z at 0.05 is -1.645. Reject H0; failure rate is now lower, suggesting fewer job applicants use drugs.
In 1990, 5.8% job applicants who were tested for drugs failed the test. At the 0.05 significant level, the test claim that the failure rate is now lower if a simple random sample of 1520 current job applicants results in 58 failure. Does the result suggest that fewer job applicants now use drugs?
This is a left-tailed test of a single proportion (large sample).
n = 1520, x = 58, p̂ = 58/1520 = 0.0382, p₀ = 0.058, q₀ = 0.942
- H0: p = 0.058 (failure rate is still 5.8%) H1: p < 0.058 (failure rate is now lower)
- Level of significance: α = 0.05
- Test statistic:
SE = √(p₀q₀/n) = √(0.058×0.942/1520) = 0.00600
z = (p̂ − p₀)/SE = (0.0382 − 0.058)/0.00600 = -3.310
- Critical value: z(0.05, left-tail) = −1.645. Reject H0 if z < −1.645.
- Decision: z = -3.310 < −1.645 (p-value = 0.0005), so reject H0.
Conclusion: at the 5% level the failure rate is now lower than 5.8% (sample rate 3.82%). The result suggests that fewer job applicants now use drugs.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Test of proportion: 60 Minutes TV share · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
- Test of proportion: 95% equipment claim · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
- Test of proportion: pumps needing repairs · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
- Confidence level; cables conforming claim · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
- Confidence level; bulb superiority claim · Probability and Statistics, chapter 6
- Point/interval estimation; CI for accident proportion · Probability and Statistics, chapter 7
- Bits per sample and information rate (4.5 kHz, 8 levels) · Communication Systems, chapter 6
- Random process; LTI output is WSS if input is WSS · Communication Systems, chapter 9
- Chi-square test on 100 random numbers · Simulation and Modeling, chapter 6
- Nominal vs effective rate; simple vs compound deposit · Engineering Economics, chapter 2