- 2072 Chaitra (CS II) · 8 marks
Noise performance of DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB-SC
Short answer
DSB-SC (FOM 1, gain 2) and SSB-SC (FOM 1, gain 1) give identical output SNR for equal transmitted power; SSB uses half the bandwidth. DSB-FC (AM) wastes power in the carrier, resulting in a figure of merit less than 1, e.g., 1/3 for 100% tone modulation.
With necessary derivation, compare noise performance of DSB-AM, DSB-SC, SSB-SC.
Receiver model. The received signal plus white noise () passes through a band-pass (IF) filter of bandwidth , then a demodulator and a low-pass filter of bandwidth (message bandwidth).
s(t) + +-------+ +-------+ +-----+
---->(+)-->| BPF |--->| demod |-->| LPF |--> y(t)
^ | B_T | | | | W |
w(t) +-------+ +-------+ +-----+
The filtered noise is narrowband and is written in in-phase/quadrature form
where and are low-pass, each with the same power as : .
Definitions. Message power .
- Input SNR
- Output SNR
- Detection gain ; figure of merit , where is the channel SNR measured in the message band (baseband reference). Both show how much the demodulator improves or worsens SNR.
DSB-FC (conventional AM). , . (Coherent and envelope detection give the same result at high SNR.)
- Signal power ; noise in :
- Coherent detection (or envelope detection at high SNR) and DC blocking:
The carrier uses power but carries no information, so the gain is reduced.
Single tone, 100% modulation. , , so :
DSB-SC (coherent detection). , .
- Signal power ; noise in , so .
- Multiply by and low-pass filter:
The quadrature noise is rejected by coherent detection, giving a 3 dB gain. With baseband reference , figure of merit .
SSB-SC (coherent detection). , .
- Signal power (since ); noise in , so .
- Multiply by and low-pass filter:
- Signal power , noise power , so
With baseband reference (, same transmitted power), figure of merit .
Comparison:
| Parameter | DSB-FC (AM) | DSB-SC | SSB-SC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission bandwidth | |||
| Detector | Envelope or coherent | Coherent | Coherent |
| Detection gain | ( at ) | 2 | 1 |
| Figure of merit (baseband ref.) | ( at ) | 1 | 1 |
| Threshold effect | Yes (envelope detector) | No | No |
| Power wasted in carrier | Yes (at least 1/2; 2/3 for a 100% tone) | No | No |
Conclusions: for the same transmitted power and noise PSD, DSB-SC and SSB give the same output SNR (equal to baseband); DSB-SC's detection gain of 2 is offset by its double noise bandwidth. SSB achieves this in half the bandwidth. DSB-FC is at least 3 dB worse (since gives FOM , with equality only for a 100% square wave) and 4.77 dB worse (a factor of 3) for 100% single-tone modulation, because the carrier carries no information; its advantage is that it allows a cheap envelope detector.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Noise performance of DSB-SC and SSB-SC · Communication Systems, chapter 9
- Compare DSB-AM, DSB-SC, SSB, VSB; SSB by phase discrimination · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- Compare DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- DSB-AM vs SSB; ring modulator for DSB-SC · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB spectra; synchronous detection · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- SSB vs AM and DSB-SC; balanced modulator · Communication Systems, chapter 2