- 2072 Asoj · 6 marks
ERR method to select best of three projects
Short answer
ERR at ε=20%: A=28.29%, B=25.99%, C=28.49%. All exceed 10% MARR. Incremental ERR: A→B=14.32%>10%, B→C=39.79%>10%. Project C is best.
Select the best project by ERR method. Take MARR = 10% and ε = 20%.
| BOY→ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROJECT A | -64,000 | 26,200 | 29,000 | 30,200 | 31,000 | 31,000 | 26,000 |
| PROJECT B | -68,000 | -4,000 | 39,200 | 38,000 | 38,000 | 38,000 | 38,000 |
| PROJECT C | -75,500 | 20,500 | 40,600 | 40,000 | 39,000 | 39,000 | 32,400 |
ERR (external rate of return) assumes net receipts are reinvested outside the project at the external rate ε. Receipts are compounded to the end of the life at ε, expenditures (negative flows) are discounted to year 0 at ε, and ERR i' solves
Σ E_t(P/F, ε, t)(F/P, i', N) = Σ R_t(F/P, ε, N - t)
Here ε = 20%, MARR = 10%, N = 6 (cash flows in Rs.).
Step 1: ERR of each project
Project A:
- Receipts compounded to year 6 at ε: FW(R) = 26,200(2.4883) + 29,000(2.0736) + 30,200(1.7280) + 31,000(1.4400) + 31,000(1.2000) + 26,000(1.0000) = 285,354
- Expenditures discounted to year 0 at ε: PW(E) = 64,000(1.0000) = 64,000
- ERR: 64,000(1 + i')^6 = 285,354 → (1 + i') = (4.4587)^(1/6) → ERR = 28.29%
Project B:
- Receipts compounded to year 6 at ε: FW(R) = 39,200(2.0736) + 38,000(1.7280) + 38,000(1.4400) + 38,000(1.2000) + 38,000(1.0000) = 285,269
- Expenditures discounted to year 0 at ε: PW(E) = 68,000(1.0000) + 4,000(0.8333) = 71,333
- ERR: 71,333(1 + i')^6 = 285,269 → (1 + i') = (3.9991)^(1/6) → ERR = 25.99%
Project C:
- Receipts compounded to year 6 at ε: FW(R) = 20,500(2.4883) + 40,600(2.0736) + 40,000(1.7280) + 39,000(1.4400) + 39,000(1.2000) + 32,400(1.0000) = 339,679
- Expenditures discounted to year 0 at ε: PW(E) = 75,500(1.0000) = 75,500
- ERR: 75,500(1 + i')^6 = 339,679 → (1 + i') = (4.4991)^(1/6) → ERR = 28.49%
| Project | ERR | vs MARR 10% |
|---|---|---|
| A | 28.29% | acceptable |
| B | 25.99% | acceptable |
| C | 28.49% | acceptable |
All three are acceptable, so an incremental comparison is needed (order of investment A 64,000 < B 68,000 < C 75,500). Incremental cash flows are found and ERR is applied on them in the same way.
Step 2: incremental ERR
Increment A → B: [-4000, -30200, 10200, 7800, 7000, 7000, 12000] ERR(B - A) = 14.32% > 10%, so B is better than A.
Increment B → C: [-7500, 24500, 1400, 2000, 1000, 1000, -5600] ERR(C - B) = 39.79% > 10%, so C is better than B.
(Check: A → C gives 27.10% > 10%.)
Answer: Select Project C. C has the highest ERR of its own (28.49%), and each extra investment, from A to B and then from B to C, earns more than the MARR of 10%.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- ERR to select between projects A and B · Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- Repeatability assumption, select best of three projects · Engineering Economics, chapter 4 · asked 2×
- Best of three mutually exclusive projects, 10-year study · Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- ERR to select best proposal A or B · Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- ERR with MARR = ε = 10% · Engineering Economics, chapter 3
- Best combination with independent and contingent projects · Engineering Economics, chapter 4
- Theodolite traverse ABCDA with missing VCR (68°30′10″) · Surveying I, chapter 7
- EPS and book value; 500 shares, EBIT 40,000, tax 40% · Project Engineering, chapter 6
- AVL tree for 10 20 30 50 45 40 8 5 3 · Data Structure and Algorithm, chapter 6
- Best financing option; EBIT Rs 350,000 · Project Engineering, chapter 6