Skip to main content

Vertical curve for overtaking sight distance

Short answer

For grades +1.2% and -1.08% (N=0.0228) at 60 km/h with overtaking acceleration 2.5 kmphps, OSD is 318.1 m. Summit curve length is 215.1 m (using S>L formula L = 2S - 9.6/N). Highest point is 113.2 m from BVC at RL 335.47 m. End of curve is at RL 334.92 m (215.1 m from BVC at RL 334.792 m).

An ascending gradient of 1.2% meets a descending gradient of 1.08% on a two lane two-way road. Determine the length of vertical curve to provide overtaking sight distance for a design speed of 60 kmph. Assume overtaking acceleration as 2.5 kmphps. Locate the highest point and end of curve, calculate their elevations if the elevation of BVC is 334.792 m.

Given: g1=+1.2%g_1 = +1.2\%, g2=−1.08%g_2 = -1.08\%, two-lane two-way road, V=60V = 60 km/h, acceleration A=2.5A = 2.5 km/h/s, BVC elevation =334.792= 334.792 m.

N=0.012+0.0108=0.0228N = 0.012 + 0.0108 = 0.0228

Assumptions (IRC): reaction time t=2t = 2 s; speed of the overtaken vehicle vb=V−16=44v_b = V - 16 = 44 km/h =12.22= 12.22 m/s; spacing s=0.7vb+6s = 0.7v_b + 6 with vbv_b in m/s (equivalently 0.2Vb+60.2V_b + 6 with VbV_b in km/h); eye height and object height both 1.2 m for overtaking.

v=60/3.6=16.67v = 60/3.6 = 16.67 m/s.

Step 1: Overtaking sight distance

d1=vb t=12.22×2=24.4 ms=0.7(12.22)+6=14.56 mT=14.4 sA=14.4×14.562.5=9.16 sd2=vbT+2s=12.22(9.16)+2(14.56)=141.0 md3=vT=16.67×9.16=152.6 m\begin{aligned} d_1 &= v_b\,t = 12.22\times2 = 24.4\ \text{m} \\ s &= 0.7(12.22) + 6 = 14.56\ \text{m} \\ T &= \sqrt{\frac{14.4\,s}{A}} = \sqrt{\frac{14.4\times14.56}{2.5}} = 9.16\ \text{s} \\ d_2 &= v_bT + 2s = 12.22(9.16) + 2(14.56) = 141.0\ \text{m} \\ d_3 &= vT = 16.67\times9.16 = 152.6\ \text{m} \end{aligned}

(The factor 14.4 is 4×3.64\times3.6, because AA is in km/h/s and ss in metres.)

OSD=24.4+141.0+152.6=318.1 mOSD = 24.4 + 141.0 + 152.6 = 318.1\ \text{m}

Step 2: Length of summit curve

Try S<LS < L: L=NS29.6=0.0228(318.1)29.6=240.3L = \dfrac{NS^2}{9.6} = \dfrac{0.0228(318.1)^2}{9.6} = 240.3 m, which is less than SS, so the assumption fails. Use S>LS > L:

L=2S−9.6N=2(318.1)−9.60.0228=636.1−421.1=215.1 mL = 2S - \frac{9.6}{N} = 2(318.1) - \frac{9.6}{0.0228} = 636.1 - 421.1 = 215.1\ \text{m}

S=318.1>L=215.1S = 318.1 > L = 215.1 m, consistent. L=215.1L = 215.1 m.

Step 3: Highest point

x=g1LN=0.012×215.10.0228=113.2 m from BVCx = \frac{g_1L}{N} = \frac{0.012\times215.1}{0.0228} = 113.2\ \text{m from BVC} RLhigh=334.792+0.012(113.2)−0.0228 (113.2)22×215.1=334.792+1.358−0.679=335.47 mRL_{high} = 334.792 + 0.012(113.2) - \frac{0.0228\,(113.2)^2}{2\times215.1} = 334.792 + 1.358 - 0.679 = 335.47\ \text{m}

Step 4: End of curve (EVC)

RLEVC=334.792+(0.012−0.0108)(215.1)2=334.792+0.129=334.92 mRL_{EVC} = 334.792 + \frac{(0.012-0.0108)(215.1)}{2} = 334.792 + 0.129 = 334.92\ \text{m}

The EVC is 215.1 m from the BVC.

Answer: OSD =318.1= 318.1 m; L=215.1L = 215.1 m; highest point 113.2 m from BVC at RL 335.47335.47 m; end of curve at RL 334.92334.92 m.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Transportation Engineering I chapter 3 questions →