- 2071 Chaitra · 8 marks
WSM vs LSM advantages, section comparison
Short answer
WSM is simple and controls service stresses but gives unknown collapse margin and is uneconomical. LSM is realistic, economical, and checks serviceability. Under-reinforced sections yield first and are preferred; over-reinforced sections crush before steel yields and are brittle, so not permitted in LSM.
Discuss in detail the working stress method versus limit state method of design with their respective advantages and disadvantages. Compare balanced, under-reinforced and over-reinforced sections in limit state and working stress design methods.
Working stress method (WSM)
Stresses under working load are limited to permissible values, using linear elastic theory and the modular ratio .
Advantages
- Simple, quick calculations, backed by long experience.
- Stresses at service load are known, so deflection and cracking are reasonably controlled.
- Suitable for liquid-retaining structures, where cracking governs.
Disadvantages
- The real stress-strain behaviour is non-linear, so the method does not predict the true strength.
- A single factor of safety is used; the margin against collapse is unknown and varies with the load combination.
- It ignores creep, shrinkage and the different variability of dead and live loads.
- Sections are uneconomical.
Limit state method (LSM)
The structure is designed for the limit states of collapse and serviceability using characteristic loads, partial safety factors and the non-linear stress-strain curves.
Advantages
- Realistic: it uses the ultimate strength, so the margin against collapse is known.
- Different partial factors for loads and materials reflect their different uncertainties.
- Serviceability (deflection, cracking) is checked explicitly.
- Sections are more economical.
Disadvantages
- More complex, with separate checks for several limit states.
- Serviceability checks may need trial and revision.
Comparison of balanced, under-reinforced and over-reinforced sections
| Section | In WSM | In LSM |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced | ; concrete and steel reach and together | ( for Fe415); concrete strain 0.0035 and steel strain are reached together |
| Under-reinforced | ; steel stress reaches first, | ; steel yields first, ; ductile failure, preferred |
| Over-reinforced | ; concrete reaches first, | ; concrete crushes before steel yields, brittle failure; not permitted (use or add compression steel) |
Under-reinforced sections are always preferred because they give warning (large deflection and cracks) before failure.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Define balanced, under, over-reinforced sections · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 4
- Balanced, under, over sections with strain diagrams · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 4
- Under, over and balanced sections · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 4 · asked 6×
- Significance of under and over-reinforced sections · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 4
- Working stress vs limit state method · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 1 · asked 6×
- Sections with stress distribution, moment expressions · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 4
- Merits of limit state over working stress · Design of Steel and Timber Structure, chapter 3 · asked 3×
- Working stress vs limit state method · Design of Steel and Timber Structure, chapter 3 · asked 3×