- 2080 Baisakh · 4+4 marks
Rankine efficiency and impulse versus reaction
Short answer
Efficiency rises with higher boiler pressure, superheating, lower condenser pressure, reheating, and regenerative feed heating. In impulse turbines, pressure drops only in nozzles with constant moving-blade pressure; reaction turbines drop pressure in both fixed and moving blades, yielding higher efficiency but more stages.
What are the ways by which efficiency of the Rankine cycle can be increased? Differentiate between impulse and reaction steam turbine.
Ways to increase the efficiency of the Rankine cycle
Rankine efficiency increases when heat is added at a higher mean temperature or rejected at a lower temperature:
- Higher boiler pressure - higher saturation temperature during boiling.
- Superheating to a higher turbine inlet temperature.
- Lower condenser pressure - lower heat rejection temperature (limited by cooling water temperature).
- Reheating the partly expanded steam.
- Regenerative feed heating with bled steam.
- Recovering flue gas heat with economiser and air preheater; using supercritical pressure or combined/binary cycles.
Impulse vs reaction steam turbine
| Point | Impulse turbine | Reaction turbine |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure drop | Whole drop occurs in the nozzles only | Drop occurs in both fixed and moving blades |
| Pressure on moving blades | Constant over the moving blades | Falls continuously across moving blades |
| Force on blades | Impulse of high-velocity jet only | Impulse + reaction of steam accelerating in the blade passage |
| Blade profile | Symmetrical, constant passage area | Aerofoil shape, converging passage |
| Fixed element | Nozzles | Fixed (guide) blades acting as nozzles |
| Steam admission | Partial or full (nozzle arcs) | Full admission all round |
| Blade velocity / speed | Very high speed per stage (needs compounding) | Lower speed, many stages |
| Number of stages | Fewer | More (for same pressure drop) |
| Efficiency | Lower | Higher |
| Size / cost | Smaller, cheaper for given power | Larger, costlier (more stages) |
| Tip leakage | Small (no pressure difference across blades) | Larger, needs close clearances and dummy piston |
| Example | De Laval, Curtis, Rateau | Parsons turbine |
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Reheat Rankine cycle: 20 MPa, 500°C · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 7
- Impulse versus reaction turbines · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 7 · asked 2×
- Throttled reheat cycle with 50 bar steam · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 7
- Open cycle gas turbine with intercooling · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 6
- Open cycle gas turbine on heavy oil · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 6
- Reheat cycle at 14 bar: ideal efficiency · Power Plant Equipment, chapter 7
- Impulse and reaction steam turbines compared · Fluid Machines, chapter 5
- Rankine cycle plots and efficiency · Fundamental of Thermodynamics & Heat Transfer, chapter 6
- Rankine cycle 2 MPa: efficiency vs Carnot · Fundamental of Thermodynamics & Heat Transfer, chapter 6
- Single-stage impulse turbine blade work and efficiency · Fluid Machines, chapter 5