Skip to main content

Throttled reheat cycle with 50 bar steam

Short answer

Based on stop-valve state for HP, η_HP = 89.5%; LP stage η_LP = 72.2%. Overall cycle efficiency is 31.1% (or 31.2% neglecting pump work), and the HP to LP work ratio is 1.18.

Steam is generated in a boiler at 50 bar and 450°C. For the purpose of governing, the steam is throttled to 30 bar before it enters the high pressure stage of turbine. After expansion in high pressure stage, the steam emerges just dry saturated and then reheated at the same pressure to 300°C before it expanded in the low pressure stage to a pressure of 0.06 bar, when it emerges again just dry and saturated. If the intermediate pressure is 3 bar, what are the stage efficiencies? Also calculate the overall cycle efficiency and work ratio shared by HP stage to that of work shared by LP stage. [Superheated and saturated steam tables were attached to the paper]

Data: boiler 50 bar, 450 C; throttled to 30 bar; HP stage 30 bar to 3 bar, exit dry saturated; reheat at 3 bar to 300 C; LP stage 3 bar to 0.06 bar, exit dry saturated. Values from steam tables (IAPWS-IF97).

StatepConditionh (kJ/kg)s (kJ/kg K)
150 bar450 C3317.06.8208
1'30 barafter throttling, h=h1h = h_1 (about 437.7 C)3317.07.0468
23 bardry saturated (actual HP exit)2724.96.9916
33 bar300 C3069.67.7037
40.06 bardry saturated (actual LP exit)2566.78.3291
50.06 barsaturated water151.490.5209

At 3 bar: hf=561.46h_f = 561.46, hfg=2163.44h_{fg} = 2163.44, sf=1.6718s_f = 1.6718, sfg=5.3198s_{fg} = 5.3198. At 0.06 bar: hfg=2415.17h_{fg} = 2415.17, sfg=7.8083s_{fg} = 7.8083, vf=0.001006v_f = 0.001006.

 1 (50 bar) --throttle--> 1' (30 bar) --HP stage-->
 2 (3 bar) --reheat--> 3 (3 bar) --LP stage-->
 4 (0.06 bar) --condenser--> 5 --pump--> boiler

HP stage efficiency

Throttling is the governing device of the HP stage, so the isentropic reference is taken from the stop-valve state 1 (50 bar, 450 C) to 3 bar:

x2s=6.8208−1.67185.3198=0.9679h2s=561.46+0.9679×2163.44=2655.4 kJ/kgηHP=h1−h2h1−h2s=3317.0−2724.93317.0−2655.4=592.1661.6=0.895\begin{aligned} x_{2s} &= \frac{6.8208 - 1.6718}{5.3198} = 0.9679 \\ h_{2s} &= 561.46 + 0.9679 \times 2163.44 = 2655.4\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ \eta_{HP} &= \frac{h_1 - h_2}{h_1 - h_{2s}} = \frac{3317.0 - 2724.9}{3317.0 - 2655.4} = \frac{592.1}{661.6} = 0.895 \end{aligned}

Note: if the reference is taken from the throttled state 1' (s=7.0468>sgs = 7.0468 > s_g at 3 bar), the isentropic end point is superheated with h=2747.6h = 2747.6 kJ/kg, which is higher than the given actual exit (2724.9). That would give an efficiency above 100%, so with these data the stage efficiency must be based on the stop-valve state (it then includes the throttling loss).

LP stage efficiency

x4s=7.7037−0.52097.8083=0.9199h4s=151.49+0.9199×2415.17=2373.2 kJ/kgηLP=h3−h4h3−h4s=3069.6−2566.73069.6−2373.2=502.9696.4=0.722\begin{aligned} x_{4s} &= \frac{7.7037 - 0.5209}{7.8083} = 0.9199 \\ h_{4s} &= 151.49 + 0.9199 \times 2415.17 = 2373.2\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ \eta_{LP} &= \frac{h_3 - h_4}{h_3 - h_{4s}} = \frac{3069.6 - 2566.7}{3069.6 - 2373.2} = \frac{502.9}{696.4} = 0.722 \end{aligned}

Overall cycle efficiency

WHP=3317.0−2724.9=592.1 kJ/kgWLP=3069.6−2566.7=502.9 kJ/kgWp=0.001006(5000−6)=5.03 kJ/kgQs=(h1−h5−Wp)+(h3−h2)=(3317.0−151.49−5.03)+(3069.6−2724.9)=3160.5+344.7=3505.2 kJ/kgη=592.1+502.9−5.033505.2=1090.03505.2=0.311\begin{aligned} W_{HP} &= 3317.0 - 2724.9 = 592.1\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ W_{LP} &= 3069.6 - 2566.7 = 502.9\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ W_p &= 0.001006 (5000 - 6) = 5.03\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ Q_s &= (h_1 - h_5 - W_p) + (h_3 - h_2) \\ &= (3317.0 - 151.49 - 5.03) + (3069.6 - 2724.9) \\ &= 3160.5 + 344.7 = 3505.2\ \text{kJ/kg} \\ \eta &= \frac{592.1 + 502.9 - 5.03}{3505.2} = \frac{1090.0}{3505.2} = 0.311 \end{aligned}

(Neglecting pump work: η=1095.0/3510.3=0.312\eta = 1095.0 / 3510.3 = 0.312.)

Work ratio HP : LP

WHPWLP=592.1502.9=1.177\frac{W_{HP}}{W_{LP}} = \frac{592.1}{502.9} = 1.177
ResultValue
HP stage efficiency89.5% (from stop valve)
LP stage efficiency72.2%
Overall cycle efficiency31.1% (31.2% without pump work)
Work shared HP : LP1.177 : 1

Answer: ηHP≈89.5%\eta_{HP} \approx 89.5\%, ηLP≈72.2%\eta_{LP} \approx 72.2\%, overall η≈31.1%\eta \approx 31.1\%, WHP/WLP≈1.18W_{HP}/W_{LP} \approx 1.18.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power Plant Equipment chapter 7 questions →