Skip to main content

Fundamental frequency of a shaft: Rayleigh and Dunkerley

Short answer

Rayleigh’s method (upper bound) uses static deflections under weight to compute ω_n from g Σ(my)/Σ(my²), yielding f_n ≈ 22.09 Hz. Dunkerley’s method (lower bound) uses 1/ω_n² = Σ 1/ω_i² with ω_i = 1/√(α_ii m_i), yielding f_n ≈ 21.43 Hz.

A shaft of diameter 50 mm and length 1.5 m is simply supported at its ends and carries three discs of mass 20 kg, 30 kg and 15 kg at distances of 0.4 m, 0.8 m and 1.2 m from one end. Neglecting the mass of the shaft and taking E=200E = 200 GPa, estimate the fundamental frequency of transverse vibration by (i) Rayleigh's method and (ii) Dunkerley's method.

Data: L=1.5L = 1.5 m, d=0.05d = 0.05 m, E=200×109E = 200\times10^9 Pa, masses 20, 30, 15 kg at x=0.4,0.8,1.2x = 0.4, 0.8, 1.2 m.

I=πd464=π(0.05)464=3.068×10−7 m4,EI=61359 N⋅m2I = \frac{\pi d^4}{64} = \frac{\pi (0.05)^4}{64} = 3.068\times10^{-7}\ \text{m}^4, \qquad EI = 61359\ \text{N·m}^2

Influence coefficients

For a unit load at distance aa from the left end (with b=L−ab = L - a), the deflection at x≤ax \le a is

α(x,a)=b x (L2−b2−x2)6EIL,αij=αji (Maxwell)\alpha(x,a) = \frac{b\,x\,(L^2 - b^2 - x^2)}{6EIL}, \qquad \alpha_{ij} = \alpha_{ji}\ (\text{Maxwell})

The influence-coefficient matrix (m/N):

[α]=10−6[0.7010.8110.4350.8111.1360.6610.4350.6610.469][\alpha] = 10^{-6}\begin{bmatrix} 0.701 & 0.811 & 0.435 \\ 0.811 & 1.136 & 0.661 \\ 0.435 & 0.661 & 0.469 \end{bmatrix}

(i) Rayleigh's method

Static deflections under the weights Wi=migW_i = m_ig: yi=∑jαijWjy_i = \sum_j\alpha_{ij}W_j.

Discmm (kg)xx (m)αii×106\alpha_{ii}\times10^6yy (mm)my (×10−3)my\ (\times10^{-3})my2 (×10−6)my^2\ (\times10^{-6})
1200.40.7010.44038.80543.87673
2300.81.1360.590617.718810.46515
3151.20.4690.34875.23121.82437
ωn2=g∑miyi∑miyi2=9.81×31.7554×10−316.16626×10−6=19270 rad2/s2\omega_n^2 = \frac{g\sum m_iy_i}{\sum m_iy_i^2} = \frac{9.81 \times 31.7554\times10^{-3}}{16.16626\times10^{-6}} = 19270\ \text{rad}^2/\text{s}^2 ωn=138.82 rad/s,fn=22.09 Hz\omega_n = 138.82\ \text{rad/s}, \qquad f_n = 22.09\ \text{Hz}

(ii) Dunkerley's method

The frequency with each mass acting alone is ωi=1αiimi\omega_i = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha_{ii}m_i}}:

Discαii×106\alpha_{ii}\times10^6ωi\omega_i (rad/s)1/ωi21/\omega_i^2 (s²)
10.701267.041.402×10−51.402\times10^{-5}
21.136171.323.407×10−53.407\times10^{-5}
30.469376.880.704×10−50.704\times10^{-5}
1ωn2=∑1ωi2=5.514×10−5⇒ωn=134.67 rad/s,fn=21.43 Hz\frac{1}{\omega_n^2} = \sum\frac{1}{\omega_i^2} = 5.514\times10^{-5} \Rightarrow \omega_n = 134.67\ \text{rad/s}, \qquad f_n = 21.43\ \text{Hz}

Comparison

Rayleigh's method gives an upper bound and Dunkerley's method a lower bound on the true fundamental frequency. Solving the eigenvalue problem exactly gives ωn=138.78\omega_n = 138.78 rad/s (f=22.087f = 22.087 Hz), which lies between them and only just below the Rayleigh value.

Answer: Rayleigh: fn≈22.09f_n \approx 22.09 Hz; Dunkerley: fn≈21.43f_n \approx 21.43 Hz.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Theory of Mechanism and Machine II chapter 9 questions →