- 2081 Baisakh · 8 marks
CC slab worst edge stress numerical
Short answer
Worst combination is summer midday edge: load stress 24.0 kg/cm2 (Westergaard) + warping stress 28.3 kg/cm2 (Bradbury C=1.049) minus friction 0.81 kg/cm2 = 51.5 kg/cm2. This exceeds typical flexural strength, so slab is inadequate.
A CC pavement slab of thickness 20cm is constructed over a granular subbase having modular of reaction 15 kg/cm². The maximum temperature difference between the top and bottom of the slab during summer day and night is found to be 18°C. The spacing between the transverse contraction joint is 4.5 m and that between longitudinal joints is 3.5 m. The design wheel load is 5100 kg, radius of contact area is 15 cm, E value of CC is 3×10⁵ kg/cm², Poisson's ratio is 0.15 and coefficient of thermal expansion is 10×10⁻⁶ per °C and friction coefficient is 1.5. Find the worst combination of stresses at the edge.
(The paper attaches the IRC edge load stress chart and Bradbury's warping stress coefficient chart.)
Given data and assumptions
cm, kg/cm3 (the unit given as kg/cm2 is taken as kg/cm3), C, m (transverse joint spacing), m, kg, cm, kg/cm2, , /C, , unit weight of concrete kg/m3. Method: IRC:58 (Westergaard, Bradbury).
Step 1 - Radius of relative stiffness
Step 2 - Edge load stress
Since cm: cm.
The IRC edge load stress chart is based on Westergaard's edge equation as modified by Teller and Sutherland, which is used here to get the value:
Step 3 - Warping stress at the edge (Bradbury)
; from the Bradbury chart/table, .
Step 4 - Frictional stress
Step 5 - Critical combinations at the edge
- Summer midday (top hotter; warping tension at the bottom adds to the load tension; friction is compressive as the slab expands): kg/cm2
- Winter midday would be with the smaller winter temperature difference (not given), so it is normally less critical.
- Night (top cooler, tension at the top; the edge load stress is not additive): kg/cm2
Answer: the worst combination is the summer-midday case, with a total edge stress of about 51.5 kg/cm2 (load 24.0 + warping 28.3 - friction 0.81). This must be compared with the flexural strength of concrete; a stress this high shows that the 20 cm slab is not adequate for 5100 kg unless the concrete is very strong, so a thicker slab is needed.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Plain CC pavement thickness by IRC, 7 m highway · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 2
- Benkelman beam overlay thickness numerical · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 4
- Rigid pavement thickness by IRC procedure · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 2
- Temperature stresses in rigid pavement; dowel bar design · Transportation Engineering II, chapter 2
- Penstock thickness (1.3 m, 20 kg/cm²) · Hydro Power, chapter 5
- Penstock thickness (1.20 m, 17.5 kg/cm²) · Hydro Power, chapter 5
- T-beam: bending stress 15 cm above base · Strength of Materials, chapter 7
- Slab continuous over three edges, 5x4 m (225 mm beam) · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 9