Skip to main content

Numerical: trunking capacity loss with sectoring

Short answer

Traffic per user = 0.0333 Erlang. Omnidirectional: 57 channels → 44.2 Erlangs, 1326 users. 60° sectored: 6×9 channels → 22.70 Erlangs, 681 users. Capacity loss =21.5 Erlangs per cell (48.% reduction), about 645 fewer users due to trunking inefficiency.

For a cluster N = 7 system with a blocking probability of 1% and an average call length of two minutes, find the traffic capacity loss for a blocked calls cleared system due to trunking for 57 channels when going from omnidirectional antennas to 60° sectored antennas. The average request rate per user is 1 call per hour.

GOS/ Channel0.5%1%2%
1.005.0101.0204
93.3333.7834.345
1910.3311.2312.33
5439.4741.5144.00
5742.144.246.8

Given: N = 7, B = 1 %, H = 2 min, λ = 1 call/hour, 57 channels per cell, blocked calls cleared (Erlang B).

Traffic per user:

Au = λH = 1 × 2/60 = 0.0333 Erlang

Omnidirectional antennas

All 57 channels form one trunk group. From the table (57 channels, 1 %):

A = 44.2 Erlangs per cell
Users per cell = 44.2 / 0.0333 = 1326 users

60° sectoring

Each cell has 6 sectors, channels per sector = 57/6 = 9.5 ≈ 9 channels. From the table (9 channels, 1 %):

A per sector = 3.783 Erlangs
A per cell   = 6 × 3.783 = 22.70 Erlangs
Users per cell = 22.70 / 0.0333 ≈ 681 users

Trunking capacity loss

Loss = 44.2 − 22.70 = 21.50 Erlangs per cell
     = 21.50 / 44.2 × 100 = 48.6 %
AntennaChannels per trunkTraffic/cellUsers/cell
Omni5744.2 E1326
60° sectors9 (×6)22.70 E681

Answer: Trunking efficiency loss ≈ 21.5 Erlangs per cell (≈ 48.6 %), about 645 fewer users per cell. Sectoring breaks a large trunk into small ones, which are less efficient; the gain from sectoring must come from the smaller cluster size it permits.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Wireless Communication chapter 2 questions →