Skip to main content

Positive definite stiffness matrix and Gauss elimination

Short answer

The matrix is symmetric and all leading principal minors (5, 16, 43) are positive, confirming positive definiteness. Gauss elimination gives u1=2.837 mm, u2=2.093 mm, u3=2.698 mm. Positive definiteness after applying boundary conditions ensures positive strain energy for any non-zero displacement and eliminates rigid-body modes, yielding a unique solution.

A three-degree-of-freedom structure has the stiffness matrix (in kN/mm)

[K]=[5−20−24−10−13][K] = \begin{bmatrix} 5 & -2 & 0 \\ -2 & 4 & -1 \\ 0 & -1 & 3 \end{bmatrix}

and load vector {F}={10, 0, 6}T\{F\} = \{10,\ 0,\ 6\}^T kN. (a) Show that [K][K] is symmetric and positive definite. (b) Solve [K]{u}={F}[K]\{u\} = \{F\} by Gauss elimination and state the displacements in mm. Why must a stiffness matrix be positive definite after boundary conditions are applied?

(a) Symmetry and positive definiteness

K12=K21=−2K_{12} = K_{21} = -2, K23=K32=−1K_{23} = K_{32} = -1, K13=K31=0K_{13} = K_{31} = 0, so [K][K] is symmetric.

For positive definiteness, all leading principal minors must be positive:

  • Δ1=5>0\Delta_1 = 5 > 0
  • Δ2=5(4)−(−2)(−2)=16>0\Delta_2 = 5(4) - (-2)(-2) = 16 > 0
  • Δ3=det⁡[K]=5(12−1)+2(−6−0)=55−12=43>0\Delta_3 = \det[K] = 5(12-1) + 2(-6-0) = 55 - 12 = 43 > 0

All are positive, so [K][K] is positive definite and a unique solution exists.

(b) Gauss elimination

Augmented matrix:

[5−2010−24−100−136]\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c} 5 & -2 & 0 & 10 \\ -2 & 4 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 3 & 6 \end{array}\right]

Step 1: R2←R2+0.4R1R_2 \leftarrow R_2 + 0.4R_1 gives [0, 3.2, −1 ∣ 4][0,\ 3.2,\ -1\,|\,4].

Step 2: R3←R3+13.2R2=R3+0.3125R2R_3 \leftarrow R_3 + \frac{1}{3.2}R_2 = R_3 + 0.3125R_2 gives [0, 0, 2.6875 ∣ 7.25][0,\ 0,\ 2.6875\,|\,7.25].

Back substitution:

u3=7.252.6875=2.698 mmu2=4+2.6983.2=2.093 mmu1=10+2(2.093)5=2.837 mm\begin{aligned} u_3 &= \frac{7.25}{2.6875} = 2.698\ \text{mm} \\ u_2 &= \frac{4 + 2.698}{3.2} = 2.093\ \text{mm} \\ u_1 &= \frac{10 + 2(2.093)}{5} = 2.837\ \text{mm} \end{aligned}

Check: row 3 gives −2.093+3(2.698)=6.00-2.093 + 3(2.698) = 6.00 kN. Also the product of pivots 5×3.2×2.6875=43=det⁡[K]5 \times 3.2 \times 2.6875 = 43 = \det[K].

Why positive definite: strain energy U=12{u}T[K]{u}U = \tfrac{1}{2}\{u\}^T[K]\{u\} must be positive for every non-zero displacement. If a rigid-body motion remains (supports missing), [K][K] is singular and the equations cannot be solved. Positive pivots also guarantee that elimination runs without row interchange.

Answer: u1=2.837u_1 = 2.837 mm, u2=2.093u_2 = 2.093 mm, u3=2.698u_3 = 2.698 mm.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Finite Element Method chapter 2 questions →