- 2078 Chaitra · 6 marks
SWOT analysis of wind power in Nepal
Short answer
Strengths: clean, no fuel, dry-season wind, modular. Weaknesses: poor data, high cost, low air density, past failures. Opportunities: wind-solar-hydro hybrids, mini-grids, climate finance. Threats: competition from hydro/solar, difficult transport, extreme weather, weak grid.
Write down the strength, weakness, opportunity and threats (SWOT) analysis for installing wind turbine for generating electricity in Nepal.
A SWOT analysis lists the internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats of installing wind turbines for electricity in Nepal.
Strengths
- Clean, renewable, no fuel cost, no emissions in operation.
- Good wind sites exist in some valleys and passes (Kagbeni and the Kali Gandaki valley in Mustang, Khumbu, parts of Palpa); SWERA (AEPC, 2008) estimated about 3,000 MW potential.
- Short construction time and modular sizes from small to MW scale.
- Wind is often stronger in the dry season, when run-of-river hydro output is lowest.
Weaknesses
- Wind is highly site-specific and variable in mountain terrain; turbulent valley winds.
- Lack of long-term, reliable wind data and resource maps at hub height.
- Low air density at high altitude reduces output.
- High capital cost per kW for small turbines; spare parts and technicians not available locally.
- Past failures (e.g. Kagbeni 20 kW turbine, 1989) due to poor maintenance.
Opportunities
- Wind–solar–hydro hybrid systems and mini-grids for remote villages not reached by the grid.
- Complements hydro to reduce dry-season deficit and import of power.
- Supply for telecom towers, trekking lodges and tourism.
- Climate finance, carbon credits and donor support; falling global turbine prices.
- Government and AEPC policies favouring renewable energy.
Threats
- Competition from cheaper, established hydropower and solar PV.
- Difficult transport of long blades and towers on narrow mountain roads.
- Extreme weather, icing, landslides and earthquakes damaging structures.
- Weak transmission network near windy sites.
- Policy and tariff uncertainty, low investor confidence.
- Possible impact on birds and visual/tourism concerns in protected areas.
| Internal | External |
|---|---|
| S: clean, dry-season wind, modular | O: hybrid mini-grids, climate finance |
| W: poor data, high cost, low density | T: hydro competition, transport, disasters |
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Wind turbine merits and output: 5.5 m blade · Power Plant Design, chapter 1
- Solar generation and wind power characteristics · Power Plant Design, chapter 1
- Nepal electricity demand, supply and trend · Power Plant Design, chapter 1
- Wind turbine output: 12 m blade, 18 m/s · Power Plant Design, chapter 1 · asked 3×
- Wind turbine output: 6.5 m blade, 9 and 18 m/s · Power Plant Design, chapter 1 · asked 3×
- Wind turbine output: 6 m blade, 8 and 16 m/s · Power Plant Design, chapter 1 · asked 3×
- Wind turbine power, tip speed ratio and energy · Energy Resources, chapter 4
- Why system modeling; weakness of structured analysis · Software Engineering, chapter 2
- Short note: SWOT analysis · Project Engineering, chapter 2
- SWOT analysis · ICT Project Management, chapter 7