- Practice · 4 marks
Cross-flow (Banki-Mitchell) turbine
Short answer
The cross-flow (Banki-Michell) turbine is a partial-admission impulse-reaction turbine with a cylindrical runner of curved blades. Water enters through a rectangular nozzle, passes through the runner twice (inward then outward), extracting energy. It is simple, cheap, self-cleaning, with flat efficiency around 80%, suitable for micro/mini hydro up to a few MW and heads 2–100 m.
Write short notes on the cross-flow (Banki-Michell) turbine, mentioning its construction, working and applications.
The cross-flow turbine (Banki-Michell or Ossberger turbine) is a partial-admission impulse-reaction turbine with a drum-shaped runner, used in small hydro plants.
water in
| nozzle with
v guide vane
+-----+
/ ___ \
| / \ | <- 1st pass: outside to inside
| | ( ) ||
| \_____/ | <- 2nd pass: inside to outside
\_________/
|
tailrace
Construction
- A cylindrical runner made of two end discs joined by 20 to 30 curved blades (flat strips bent to arc form, about 30 mm to 50 mm apart on rim).
- A rectangular nozzle of the width of the runner, with an adjustable guide vane (flow regulator), directs water at about 16 degrees to the tangent.
- The casing leads water to the tailrace. Head range is about 2 to 100 m.
Working
Water from the nozzle strikes the blades near the rim and flows inward through the runner (first pass, about 70 to 80 % of the power), crosses the empty space inside the drum and passes through the blades outward a second time (about 20 to 30 %). It thus crosses the runner twice, hence the name. The pressure at entry and exit is nearly atmospheric.
Advantages and applications
- Simple, cheap, easy to build locally and repair; suitable for micro and mini hydro (up to a few MW).
- Flat efficiency curve (about 80 % over a wide load range), by splitting the runner into sections of different width (1/3 and 2/3 as in Ossberger design).
- Self-cleaning, since the leaves and sand fall off in the second pass.
- Used for low to medium heads and widely used in rural electrification schemes.
- Disadvantage: peak efficiency (about 80 to 87 %) is lower than Pelton or Francis turbines.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Sonnet 5.5
Related questions
- Francis turbine: construction and working · Fluid Machines, chapter 3
- Kaplan turbine construction and working · Fluid Machines, chapter 3
- Derivation of Euler's turbine equation · Fluid Machines, chapter 1
- Francis turbine velocity triangles and power · Fluid Machines, chapter 3
- Kaplan turbine discharge and blade angles · Fluid Machines, chapter 3
- Single-stage impulse turbine blade work and efficiency · Fluid Machines, chapter 5
- LVDT construction, working and applications · Instrumentation and Measurement, chapter 5
- Stepper motor construction, principle and applications · Electric Machines II, chapter 3
- Schrage motor construction and working · Electric Machines II, chapter 3
- Steady state work vs steady flow; turbine, nozzle · Fundamental of Thermodynamics & Heat Transfer, chapter 4