- 2071 Shrawan · 3+7 marks
Why force method; continuous beam with settlements
Short answer
The method's primary unknowns are redundant forces, hence called force method. For the beam with B settling 18 mm and C 12 mm, select R_B as redundant; compatibility with δ_B = -0.018 m gives R_B = -16.99 kN (downward), R_A = R_C = 8.50 kN upward.
Explain why the flexibility method is called a Force Method. Using the force method determine the reactions in the continuous beam shown in figure below, if support B settles 18 mm and support C settles 12 mm. Given EI is constant, and . [Figure: beam ABC, all supports; AB = BC = 4.8 m.]
Why the flexibility method is a force method
In the flexibility method the unknowns are redundant forces (reactions or internal forces). The redundants are applied as loads on a statically determinate primary structure, and their values are found from the compatibility equations , in which the flexibility coefficients convert forces into displacements. Since the primary unknowns are forces, the method is called the force method (the displacements are found afterwards).
Continuous beam with settlements
Reading of the figure: beam ABC on three supports, A a hinge and B, C rollers, m. kN/mm kN/m and mm m, so
There is no load, so the reactions arise only from the settlements: B settles 18 mm and C settles 12 mm.
. Remove the support B and take (upward) as the redundant. The primary structure is a simply supported beam AC of span m.
Displacement of B in the primary structure
C settles by 12 mm, so the straight primary beam moves as a rigid body, and the point B moves down by half of this:
Flexibility coefficient
Deflection at mid-span of a simply supported beam due to a unit load there:
Compatibility
In the actual beam B is displaced downward by 18 mm, that is, m in the direction of :
The negative sign means that the reaction at B acts downward (the support pulls the beam down).
Other reactions
Check: .
Bending moment
kNm (sagging, tension at the bottom); . The SF is kN in AB and kN in BC.
Answer: kN (upward) and kN (i.e. 16.99 kN downward).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Flexibility matrix: reactions at support D · Theory of Structures II, chapter 2
- Flexibility method: beam reactions at B and C · Theory of Structures II, chapter 2
- Flexibility matrix: reactions at E and A, BMD · Theory of Structures II, chapter 2
- Flexibility matrix: frame reactions at D, SFD, BMD · Theory of Structures II, chapter 2
- Force method: frame reactions at hinged support · Theory of Structures II, chapter 2
- Slope deflection: D rotates, C settles 4 mm · Theory of Structures II, chapter 3
- Beam ABC with wire support: BMD and SFD · Strength of Materials, chapter 1
- Conjugate beam: slopes at supports, deflection at E · Theory of Structures I, chapter 4
- Design pipes AB and BC, A RL 210 m, 44 and 18 lps · Water Supply Engineering, chapter 7
- Slab continuous over three edges, 5x4 m (225 mm beam) · Design of RCC Structure, chapter 9