Skip to main content

Why force method; continuous beam with settlements

Short answer

The method's primary unknowns are redundant forces, hence called force method. For the beam with B settling 18 mm and C 12 mm, select R_B as redundant; compatibility with δ_B = -0.018 m gives R_B = -16.99 kN (downward), R_A = R_C = 8.50 kN upward.

Explain why the flexibility method is called a Force Method. Using the force method determine the reactions in the continuous beam shown in figure below, if support B settles 18 mm and support C settles 12 mm. Given EI is constant, E=232 kN/mm2E = 232\ \text{kN/mm}^2 and I=112.5×106 mm4I = 112.5\times10^{6}\ \text{mm}^4. [Figure: beam ABC, all supports; AB = BC = 4.8 m.]

Why the flexibility method is a force method

In the flexibility method the unknowns are redundant forces (reactions or internal forces). The redundants are applied as loads on a statically determinate primary structure, and their values are found from the compatibility equations ∑fijXj+Δi0=δi\sum f_{ij}X_j + \Delta_{i0} = \delta_i, in which the flexibility coefficients fijf_{ij} convert forces into displacements. Since the primary unknowns are forces, the method is called the force method (the displacements are found afterwards).

Continuous beam with settlements

Reading of the figure: beam ABC on three supports, A a hinge and B, C rollers, AB=BC=4.8AB = BC = 4.8 m. E=232E = 232 kN/mm2=232×106^2 = 232\times10^6 kN/m2^2 and I=112.5×106I = 112.5\times10^6 mm4=1.125×10−4^4 = 1.125\times10^{-4} m4^4, so

EI=232×106×1.125×10−4=26100 kNm2EI = 232\times10^6\times1.125\times10^{-4} = 26100\ \text{kNm}^2

There is no load, so the reactions arise only from the settlements: B settles 18 mm and C settles 12 mm.

Ds=1D_s = 1. Remove the support B and take RBR_B (upward) as the redundant. The primary structure is a simply supported beam AC of span 9.69.6 m.

Displacement of B in the primary structure

C settles by 12 mm, so the straight primary beam moves as a rigid body, and the point B moves down by half of this:

Δ10=0.5×12=6 mm downward=−0.006 m (in the direction of RB)\Delta_{10} = 0.5\times12 = 6\ \text{mm downward} = -0.006\ \text{m (in the direction of } R_B)

Flexibility coefficient

Deflection at mid-span of a simply supported beam due to a unit load there:

f11=L348EI=9.6348×26100=7.062×10−4 m/kNf_{11} = \frac{L^3}{48EI} = \frac{9.6^3}{48\times26100} = 7.062\times10^{-4}\ \text{m/kN}

Compatibility

In the actual beam B is displaced downward by 18 mm, that is, −0.018-0.018 m in the direction of RBR_B:

Δ10+f11RB=−0.018 ⇒ RB=−0.018+0.0067.062×10−4=−16.99 kN\Delta_{10} + f_{11}R_B = -0.018 \ \Rightarrow\ R_B = \frac{-0.018 + 0.006}{7.062\times10^{-4}} = -16.99\ \text{kN}

The negative sign means that the reaction at B acts downward (the support pulls the beam down).

Other reactions

RA=RC=−RB2=8.50 kN (↑)R_A = R_C = -\frac{R_B}{2} = 8.50\ \text{kN}\ (\uparrow)

Check: RA+RB+RC=0R_A + R_B + R_C = 0.

Bending moment

MB=RA×4.8=40.78M_B = R_A\times4.8 = 40.78 kNm (sagging, tension at the bottom); MA=MC=0M_A = M_C = 0. The SF is +8.50+8.50 kN in AB and −8.50-8.50 kN in BC.

Answer: RA=RC=8.50R_A = R_C = 8.50 kN (upward) and RB=−16.99R_B = -16.99 kN (i.e. 16.99 kN downward).

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Theory of Structures II chapter 2 questions →