- 2078 Chaitra · 2+3 marks
Why SSB preferred; AM power at 100% modulation
Short answer
SSB is preferred because it uses only half the bandwidth (f_m instead of 2f_m) and transmits no wasted carrier or duplicate sideband, saving about 83% power. For 1000 W total AM power at 100% modulation, carrier power is 666.67 W, and each sideband carries 166.67 W.
Why SSB modulation scheme is preferred over DSB, DSB-SC modulation schemes? The total content of an AM signal is 1000 W. Determine the power being transmitted at carrier frequency and at each sideband when modulation percentage is 100%.
Why SSB is preferred
SSB (single sideband suppressed carrier) sends only one sideband. It is preferred over DSB-FC and DSB-SC because:
- Half bandwidth: SSB needs only , while DSB-FC and DSB-SC need . Twice as many channels fit in a band.
- Power saving: The carrier carries no information. At , DSB-FC wastes 2/3 of the power in the carrier; DSB-SC still sends a redundant second sideband. SSB puts all power in one sideband (about 83% saving over DSB-FC at ).
- Better S/N: Narrower bandwidth means less noise power at the receiver.
- Less selective fading: Only one sideband, so phase differences between sidebands cannot cancel each other.
Numerical
Given W, (100%).
Answer: Carrier power = 666.67 W; power in each sideband = 166.67 W (USB = LSB).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- DSB-AM vs SSB; ring modulator for DSB-SC · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- Compare DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- Compare DSB-AM, DSB-SC, SSB, VSB; SSB by phase discrimination · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- SSB vs AM and DSB-SC; balanced modulator · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB spectra; synchronous detection · Communication Systems, chapter 2
- Noise performance of DSB-AM, DSB-SC and SSB-SC · Communication Systems, chapter 9
- AM numerical: 20 sin2π500t on 60 sin2π10⁶t · Data Communication, chapter 5