Skip to main content

Why SSB preferred; AM power at 100% modulation

Short answer

SSB is preferred because it uses only half the bandwidth (f_m instead of 2f_m) and transmits no wasted carrier or duplicate sideband, saving about 83% power. For 1000 W total AM power at 100% modulation, carrier power is 666.67 W, and each sideband carries 166.67 W.

Why SSB modulation scheme is preferred over DSB, DSB-SC modulation schemes? The total content of an AM signal is 1000 W. Determine the power being transmitted at carrier frequency and at each sideband when modulation percentage is 100%.

Why SSB is preferred

SSB (single sideband suppressed carrier) sends only one sideband. It is preferred over DSB-FC and DSB-SC because:

  • Half bandwidth: SSB needs only fmf_m, while DSB-FC and DSB-SC need 2fm2f_m. Twice as many channels fit in a band.
  • Power saving: The carrier carries no information. At μ=1\mu = 1, DSB-FC wastes 2/3 of the power in the carrier; DSB-SC still sends a redundant second sideband. SSB puts all power in one sideband (about 83% saving over DSB-FC at μ=1\mu=1).
  • Better S/N: Narrower bandwidth means less noise power at the receiver.
  • Less selective fading: Only one sideband, so phase differences between sidebands cannot cancel each other.

Numerical

Given Pt=1000P_t = 1000 W, μ=1\mu = 1 (100%).

Pt=Pc(1+μ22)⇒Pc=Pt1+μ2/2P_t = P_c\left(1 + \frac{\mu^2}{2}\right) \Rightarrow P_c = \frac{P_t}{1 + \mu^2/2} Pc=10001+0.5=666.67 WPSB, total=Pt−Pc=1000−666.67=333.33 WPUSB=PLSB=μ24Pc=14(666.67)=166.67 W\begin{aligned} P_c &= \frac{1000}{1 + 0.5} = 666.67\ \text{W} \\ P_{SB,\,total} &= P_t - P_c = 1000 - 666.67 = 333.33\ \text{W} \\ P_{USB} = P_{LSB} &= \frac{\mu^2}{4}P_c = \frac{1}{4}(666.67) = 166.67\ \text{W} \end{aligned}

Answer: Carrier power = 666.67 W; power in each sideband = 166.67 W (USB = LSB).

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Communication Systems chapter 2 questions →