- 2076 Shrawan · 6+2+2 marks
Sensitivity of PW, most sensitive parameter
Short answer
Base PW = Rs 63,192 (N=10, MARR=10%, salvage=Rs 10,000). Over ±15%, annual revenue is most sensitive (PW swing Rs 119,819), then initial investment (Rs 37,500), then useful life (Rs 32,078). PW stays positive; revenue would need ~16% fall to reach zero.
A project costs Rs 125,000 with annual revenue of Rs 65,000 and annual cost of Rs 35,000. Salvage value will be 8% of the initial investment. Perform sensitivity analysis using PW formulation over a range of ±15% in (i) initial investment (ii) annual revenue (iii) useful life. Draw the sensitivity diagram and indicate which parameter is most sensitive.
Assumptions (not given in the question): useful life N = 10 years, MARR = 10%, salvage value S = 8% × 125,000 = 10,000 (kept at this base value when the investment is varied). Net annual revenue = 65,000 − 35,000 = 30,000.
PW = −I + (R − C)(P/A,10%,N) + S(P/F,10%,N)
Base case
PW₀ = −125,000 + 30,000(P/A,10%,10) + 10,000(P/F,10%,10)
= −125,000 + 30,000(6.1446) + 10,000(0.3855)
= 63,192
One parameter is changed at a time; the others stay at base values. For useful life the factors are computed by formula for the (fractional) life, e.g. at +15%, N = 11.5.
Results of ±15% change
| Change | PW: Initial investment | PW: Annual revenue | PW: Useful life |
|---|---|---|---|
| -15% | 81,942 | 3,283 | 46,009 |
| -10% | 75,692 | 23,253 | 52,012 |
| -5% | 69,442 | 43,223 | 57,735 |
| +0% | 63,192 | 63,192 | 63,192 |
| +5% | 56,942 | 83,162 | 68,396 |
| +10% | 50,692 | 103,132 | 73,357 |
| +15% | 44,442 | 123,102 | 78,087 |
Sensitivity diagram
123.1 | A
|
107.7 |
| A
92.3 |
| I A
76.9 | I U U
| I U
61.6 | U *
| U I I
46.2 | U A I
|
30.8 |
| A
15.4 |
|
0.0 |---A---------------------------------------------
+-------------------------------------------------
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
% change (y: PW in Rs '000; I = Initial investment, A = Annual revenue, U = Useful life)
Interpretation
- Annual revenue: PW changes from 3,283 to 123,102 over the range (swing 119,819). PW becomes zero at about -15.8% change (beyond the range tested).
- Initial investment: PW changes from 44,442 to 81,942 over the range (swing 37,500). PW becomes zero at about +50.6% change (beyond the range tested).
- Useful life: PW changes from 46,009 to 78,087 over the range (swing 32,078). PW becomes zero at about -47.0% change (beyond the range tested).
Steepest line (largest swing): Annual revenue. A 15% fall in annual revenue (= Rs 9,750 a year) cuts PW by about Rs 59,910, about 3.2 times the effect of a 15% rise in investment (Rs 18,750).
Answer: The most sensitive parameter is annual revenue, then initial investment, then useful life. The project remains acceptable (PW > 0) in all cases; only a fall of about 16% in revenue would make PW zero.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- AW sensitivity to investment and net annual cash flow · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Sensitivity to investment, revenue and life · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Sensitivity on investment, revenue and life; interpret · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Sensitivity of PW to investment and MARR · Engineering Economics, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Sensitivity on initial cost and life; interpret · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- PW sensitivity to investment, income, life by ±25% · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- EVA; 10 days, 100,000, day 6, Rs 65,000 · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- Annual charge and pf improvement (Rs 65/kVA tariff) · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- EVA application; 35 days, Rs 8,00,000 spent · Project Engineering, chapter 4
- EPS and book value; ABC project Rs 6,00,000 · Project Engineering, chapter 6