- 2069 Bhadra · 8 marks
Sensitivity graph, most sensitive element
Short answer
Base PW = $934. Most sensitive to annual receipts (PW zero at -4.5% change), then life (PW zero at -7.1%), then rate of return (PW zero at +10.5%). Proposal marginally acceptable; a 4.5% drop in receipts makes it unacceptable.
A proposal is described by the following estimates: P = $20000, S = 0, N = 5 and net annual receipts = $7000. A rate of return of 20 percent is desired on such proposals. Construct a sensitivity graph for deviations over a range of ±20 percent in the life, annual receipts, and rate of return. To which element is the decision most sensitive?
Data: P = $20,000; S = 0; N = 5 years; A = $7,000/year; desired rate of return i = 20%. Use PW = −20,000 + A(P/A,i,N), varying one element at a time over ±20%.
Base case
PW₀ = −20,000 + 7,000(P/A,20%,5) = −20,000 + 7,000(2.9906) = $934
Values used
| Change | Life N | Receipts A | Rate i |
|---|---|---|---|
| −20% | 4 | 5,600 | 16% |
| −10% | 4.5 | 6,300 | 18% |
| 0 | 5 | 7,000 | 20% |
| +10% | 5.5 | 7,700 | 22% |
| +20% | 6 | 8,400 | 24% |
Example: life −20% → N = 4: PW = −20,000 + 7,000(2.5887) = -1,879. Rate −20% → i = 16%: PW = −20,000 + 7,000(3.2743) = 2,920.
Sensitivity results
| Change | PW: Annual receipts | PW: Life | PW: Rate of return |
|---|---|---|---|
| -20% | -3,253 | -1,879 | 2,920 |
| -10% | -1,159 | -408 | 1,890 |
| +0% | 934 | 934 | 934 |
| +10% | 3,028 | 2,160 | 45 |
| +20% | 5,121 | 3,279 | -782 |
Sensitivity graph
5.1 | A
|
4.1 |
|
3.0 | R A L
|
2.0 | R L
|
0.9 | *
|
-0.1 |-------------------------------R-------------
| L R
-1.2 | A
| L
-2.2 |
|
-3.3 | A
+---------------------------------------------
-20 -10 0 10 20
% change (y: PW in $ '000; A = Annual receipts, L = Life, R = Rate of return)
Interpretation
- Annual receipts: PW changes from -3,253 to 5,121 over the range (swing 8,374). PW becomes zero at about -4.5% change (inside the range tested).
- Life: PW changes from -1,879 to 3,279 over the range (swing 5,157). PW becomes zero at about -7.1% change (inside the range tested).
- Rate of return: PW changes from -782 to 2,920 over the range (swing 3,702). PW becomes zero at about +10.5% change (inside the range tested).
The receipts line is the steepest and crosses zero at about -4.5% (A = $6,688 a year), the closest to the base point. A fall of more than about 4.5% in receipts alone makes the proposal unacceptable at 20%.
Answer: The decision is most sensitive to the annual receipts, followed by life and then the rate of return. The proposal is only marginally acceptable (PW = $934).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Sensitivity of PW, most sensitive parameter · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Find required annual receipts A · Engineering Economics, chapter 3
- Sensitivity to investment, revenue and life · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- AW sensitivity to investment and net annual cash flow · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Sensitivity on investment, revenue and life; interpret · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Sensitivity on initial cost and life; interpret · Engineering Economics, chapter 6
- Prove mean annual flood has 2.33-year return period · Engineering Hydrology, chapter 6
- Decision tree formulas; 20 servers, 10 E · Telecommunications, chapter 6
- Most economical conductor from cost data · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Most economical conductor, five options (Rs 7.2) · Transmission and Distribution System Design, chapter 4 · asked 3×