- 2078 Chaitra · 5 marks
Kennedy's theory features and limitations
Short answer
Kennedy's theory uses critical velocity V0 = 0.55 m D^0.64 to keep silt suspended by bed eddies, with trial-and-error design using Kutter's formula. Limitations include ignoring side eddies, empirical m selection, non-unique dimensions, reliance on Kutter's n, regional data bias, uncontrolled B/D ratio, and no silt load consideration.
Discuss the salient features of Kennedy's theory for the design of earthen channels based on the critical velocity concept and mention its limitations.
Kennedy's theory (R.G. Kennedy, 1895, from the Upper Bari Doab canal, Punjab) is for the design of alluvial earthen channels that neither silt nor scour.
Salient features
- Silt is kept in suspension by the vertical components of eddies formed at the channel bed. The channel remains stable when the mean velocity equals the critical velocity .
- Critical velocity: , = depth (m), = critical velocity ratio ( = 1.1 for coarse silt, 0.8 for very fine silt, 1.0 for normal).
- The mean velocity in the channel is found from Kutter's formula (or Manning's) with a rugosity coefficient .
- For a given and the section is found by trial and error so that , with .
- Valid for stable channels in alluvium which carry fine silt, with trapezoidal section and side slopes taken from soil types.
- A tabular/graphical (Garret's diagram) solution can be used to reduce the work.
Limitations
- Considers eddies from the bed only; sides ignored.
- is chosen by judgement; there is no relation to the silt grade or the silt charge.
- A single equation () is used for a design that actually involves several unknowns (), so the depth and width are not uniquely determined unless or is assumed.
- Requires Kutter's , which is not well defined for silt-laden flow.
- Based on the data of one region (Upper Bari Doab canals), not on fully regime channels.
- Trial-and-error design; the bed width/depth relation is not controlled, and the ratio can become unreasonable.
- Does not account for the silt load carried, so cannot be used where the canal carries heavy silt.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Kennedy design: Q 5 cumec · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4 · asked 2×
- Kennedy design: Q 7 cumec · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4 · asked 2×
- Kennedy design: Q 40, slope 1 in 5000 · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4
- Kennedy design: Q 10, n 0.0245 · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Kennedy design: Q 40, n 0.018 · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4 · asked 3×
- Kennedy and Lacey silt theories compared · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 4 · asked 4×
- Features of microprocessor based instrumentation · Instrumentation II, chapter 1 · asked 4×
- Design criteria of earthen embankment dam · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Causes of earthen dam failure; safe design · Hydropower Engineering, chapter 4
- Theory of filtration and its limitations · Water Supply Engineering, chapter 6 · asked 2×
All Irrigation and Drainage Engineering chapter 4 questions →