- 2080 Chaitra · 5+3+1 marks
Khosla: barrage HGL and floor thickness
Short answer
No‑flow head 11.25 m; required floor thickness up to 3.7 m exceeds provided 1.0 m; exit gradient 0.327 >0.200 (1/5) – unsafe against uplift and piping.
A barrage weir profile with an upstream pond level of 1135.0 m and downstream tailwater level of 1126.5 m is given below. Assume 1.0 m initial thickness of the floor throughout the length and the sheet pile is 0.5 m inside from the edge of the floor. Draw the hydraulic gradient line (HGL) and compute the designed thickness of the floor for no flow condition. Check the profile for piping failure. The safe exit gradient for the soil on which the weir is standing is 1:5.
[Figure: weir section; pond level 1135.0 m, crest 1127.0 m, upstream floor level 1126.5 m, upstream pile bottom 1120.5 m, downstream floor level 1123.75 m, downstream tailwater 1126.5 m, downstream pile bottom 1118.5 m; upstream glacis 1:3 and downstream 1:3 slopes; horizontal dimensions 13.5 m, 0.5 m, 6.25 m, 9.75 m and 40 m; end points E1, C1 (upstream) and E2, C2 (downstream)]
Data and assumptions
- Pond level 1135.0 m. For the no-flow condition the d/s water level is taken at the d/s floor level 1123.75 m, so the head is m.
- The u/s sheet pile (bottom 1120.5 m) is 6.0 m deep below the u/s floor (1126.5 m). The d/s pile (bottom 1118.5 m) is 5.25 m deep below the d/s floor (1123.75 m). Floor length between the piles m.
- Floor thickness 1.0 m throughout (given); specific gravity of concrete .
- Slope correction for a 1:3 slope , multiplied by (slope length / ): u/s slope length m (up the slope, subtracted at ); d/s glacis length m (down the slope, added at ).
Khosla's constants
, , , (in percent), total floor length m. For the u/s pile, and .
| Pile | d (m) | α | λ | φE (%) | φD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U/s pile | 6.00 | 6.667 | 3.871 | 33.94 | 23.40 |
| D/s pile | 5.25 | 7.619 | 4.342 | 31.86 | 22.04 |
Pressures at the key points
Pressure is expressed as a percentage of the head m (no flow).
| Point | Simple φ (%) | Corrections (%) | Corrected φ (%) | Pressure head (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E1 (top of u/s pile) | 100.00 | 0 | 100.00 | 11.25 |
| D1 | 76.60 | - | 76.60 | 8.62 |
| C1 | 66.06 | thk +1.76, int +2.97, slope -0.17 | 70.62 | 7.94 |
| E2 | 31.86 | thk -1.87, int -1.15, slope +1.10 | 29.94 | 3.37 |
| D2 | 22.04 | - | 22.04 | 2.48 |
| C2 (d/s end) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Corrections: thk = floor thickness, at C and at E; int = mutual interference, (at : m, m; at : m, m; m), positive at and negative at ; slope = slope correction. The D points are not corrected.
Floor thickness
Unbalanced head = hydraulic-gradient level at the floor floor top level; required thickness with (the HGL is taken as a straight line from to along the floor).
| Location | x (m) | φ (%) | HG level (m) | Floor top (m) | Unbalanced head (m) | Required t (m) | Provided t (m) | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 (u/s pile junction) | 0 | 70.62 | 1131.69 | 1126.50 | 5.19 | 3.71 | 1.00 | not safe |
| Toe of d/s glacis | 23.75 | 46.47 | 1128.98 | 1123.75 | 5.23 | 3.73 | 1.00 | not safe |
| E2 (d/s pile junction) | 40 | 29.94 | 1127.12 | 1123.75 | 3.37 | 2.41 | 1.00 | not safe |
Exit gradient
Permissible . Not safe against piping; deepen the d/s pile or lengthen the floor.
Hydraulic gradient line
Bars show the corrected pressure (each # is 2.5%):
E1 100.0% |########################################
D1 76.6% |###############################
C1 70.6% |############################
E2 29.9% |############
D2 22.0% |#########
C2 0.0% |
The hydraulic gradient line (HGL) drops vertically across each pile (from E to D to C) and runs as a straight line along the floor between the pile junctions ( to ).
Conclusion: For no flow, the floor needs about 3.7 m thickness at the u/s junction and at the toe of the glacis, reducing to about 2.4 m at the d/s pile. The 1.0 m provided is not enough anywhere, so the floor must be thickened (or the u/s floor lengthened and the u/s pile deepened to reduce the uplift). The exit gradient (1/3.1) exceeds the safe value of 1/5, so the profile is also unsafe against piping; the d/s pile must be deepened.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Khosla: HGL and d/s floor thickness, three piles · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5
- Khosla: residual pressures and HGL, pond 260 m · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5
- Khosla: cistern floor thickness from corrected phi · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5
- Khosla: HGL and exit gradient, pond 102.50 · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5
- Uplift at inside corners, 50 m floor weir · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5 · asked 2×
- Khosla (analytical): uplift and d/s floor thickness · Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, chapter 5
- Resistance of alloy sheet along length and thickness · Basic Electrical Engineering, chapter 1
- Anchored sheet pile, free earth, with anchor pull · Foundation Engineering, chapter 5
- Slope change 1/120 to 1/1500, jump and profile length · Hydraulics, chapter 8
- Sheet pile seepage quantity numerical · Soil Mechanics, chapter 7
All Irrigation and Drainage Engineering chapter 5 questions →