Skip to main content

Separate vs combined sewerage systems

Short answer

Separate systems use two conduits (sewage and storm water), have higher initial cost but smaller sewers, steady treatment load, no overflow pollution, and suit heavy monsoon areas. Combined systems use one conduit, lower initial cost but large sewers, variable flow causing silting, overflow pollution risk, and suit moderate rainfall with steep terrain. Partially separate systems carry sewage plus some storm water, offering moderate cost and size, and suit areas with existing storm drains and moderate rainfall.

Compare the separate, combined and partially separate systems of sewerage (in tabular form), giving the merits and demerits of each and the conditions favourable for the adoption of each.

Comparison of the three systems

PointSeparateCombinedPartially separate
CarriesSewage only (storm water in separate drains)Sewage and all storm waterSewage and a part of storm water
Number of conduitsTwo setsOneOne sewer plus surface drains
Size of sewerSmallLargeMedium
Initial costHigher (two systems)LowerMedium
Flow variationSmallVery largeModerate
Self-cleansing in dry seasonGoodPoor, silting likelyFair
Load on treatment plantSteady, smallHeavy in rain, needs overflowModerate
Pollution by overflowNonePossibleSlight
MaintenanceEasyDifficult (large sewers)Moderate

Separate system

Merits: smaller sewers; treatment plant is smaller and cheaper; no storm overflow pollution; storm water can go directly to streams; sewers flow at good velocity. Demerits: two systems cost more; small sewers can block easily; storm drains may get contaminated by wrong connections. Favourable conditions: heavy and long monsoon rain; dry-season sewage flow very small compared with the storm flow; flat terrain with little fall; a natural stream is near for storm water; sewage must be pumped.

Combined system

Merits: one pipe laid, so a single house connection and cheaper total cost; large sewers are self-flushed by storm water and are easy to enter for cleaning; only one system to maintain in narrow streets. Demerits: large sewers are costly; the treatment plant must handle the large wet-weather flow or overflow pollutes the river; flow is low and silting occurs in dry weather; pumping is costly. Favourable conditions: moderate, well-distributed rainfall; limited space for two sets of pipes; steep ground so that dry flow keeps sufficient velocity; storm drainage and sewage both needed at the same time as in a densely built-up area with an existing disposal point.

Partially separate system

Merits: moderate size of sewer; economical compared with the separate system; roof and courtyard runoff flushes the sewer. Demerits: the sewer size is still larger than in the separate system; the plant sees some storm load; household connections are complicated, and silting may occur in the dry season. Favourable conditions: when part of the storm water (from roofs and paved yards) can be admitted but street runoff must be carried separately, as in areas with moderate rainfall and where an existing storm drain exists.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Sanitary Engineering chapter 1 questions →