- 2079 Jestha · 2+6 marks
Hardness, toughness and aggregate blend
Short answer
Hardness is resistance to wear (Los Angeles abrasion test); toughness is resistance to impact (aggregate impact value test). The graphical blending method shows the allowable proportion of aggregate P is 37.5% to 62.5%, controlled by the 2.36 mm sieve. Thus the best blend is P:Q = 50:50.
Define Hardness and Toughness of aggregate along with example of the test to determine below. Determine the best proportion of Aggregates A and B (P and Q) given below that will produce an aggregate blend meeting the given specification limits using graphical method.
| IS Sieve Size (mm) | Aggregate P (% passing) | Aggregate Q (% passing) | Specification limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 19.0 | 100 | 95 | 95 - 100 |
| 9.5 | 80 | 55 | 60 - 75 |
| 4.75 | 60 | 35 | 40 - 55 |
| 2.36 | 55 | 15 | 30 - 40 |
| 0.60 | 25 | 10 | 12 - 22 |
| 0.075 | 5 | 9 | 3 - 10 |
Hardness and toughness
- Hardness is the resistance of aggregate to wear (abrasion and attrition) by the rubbing action of vehicle wheels. Test: Los Angeles abrasion test (limit about 30% for a wearing course) or the Deval attrition test.
- Toughness is the resistance of aggregate to failure by impact (sudden shock) from moving loads. Test: aggregate impact value test (AIV not more than 30% for a wearing course; 45% for base).
Aggregate blend by graphical method
Given: Aggregates P and Q with a specified grading envelope. Let be the fraction of P and the fraction of Q. At every sieve:
In the graphical method for two aggregates, the % passing of Q is marked on the left vertical axis (0% P) and that of P on the right vertical axis (100% P), and a straight line joins the two points for each sieve. The specification limits are marked on each sieve line, and the vertical band common to all the lines gives the allowable range of the proportion of P. The same range is obtained by solving for at each sieve:
| Sieve (mm) | P | Q | Spec | Allowed proportion of P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | any |
| 19.0 | 100 | 95 | 95-100 | 0 to 100% |
| 9.5 | 80 | 55 | 60-75 | 20 to 80% |
| 4.75 | 60 | 35 | 40-55 | 20 to 80% |
| 2.36 | 55 | 15 | 30-40 | 37.5 to 62.5% |
| 0.60 | 25 | 10 | 12-22 | 13.3 to 80% |
| 0.075 | 5 | 9 | 3-10 | any |
Common range: P between 37.5% and 62.5% (controlled by the 2.36 mm sieve), so Q is between 62.5% and 37.5%.
Best proportion: the mid-point, P : Q = 50 : 50. Check:
| Sieve (mm) | 25 | 19 | 9.5 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 0.60 | 0.075 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blend 50:50 | 100 | 97.5 | 67.5 | 47.5 | 35.0 | 17.5 | 7.0 |
| Spec | 100 | 95-100 | 60-75 | 40-55 | 30-40 | 12-22 | 3-10 |
| Within? | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Answer: Aggregate P : Aggregate Q = 50 : 50 (any proportion of P between about 38% and 62% satisfies the specification, and 50% gives a gradation near the middle of the envelope).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Hardness test of aggregate · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Mixing three gravel quarries to specification · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6
- Aggregate impact value test · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Aggregate crushing value test · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6 · asked 7×
- Soundness test of aggregate · Transportation Engineering I, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Hardness, toughness and strength compared · Civil Engineering Materials, chapter 1
- Cantilever 3 m: bending stress 25 mm below top · Strength of Materials, chapter 7
- Classify fits from given limits of size · Metrology, chapter 9
- Process to determine wire size · Basic Electrical and Electronics Engineering, chapter 4