- 2073 Chaitra · 8 marks
Static Ward-Leonard four quadrant control
Short answer
Static Ward-Leonard uses a dual converter back-to-back for four-quadrant control; the non-circulating scheme blocks one converter with dead time, while the circulating scheme fires both with alpha sum 180 degrees and uses a reactor. It has no rotating machines, higher efficiency, faster response, and lower maintenance than conventional Ward-Leonard control.
Explain static Ward-Leonard control scheme for four quadrant control of separately excited motor. Discuss non circulating and circulating current schemes. Mention its merits over conventional Ward-Leonard control.
The static Ward-Leonard drive replaces the M–G set of the conventional Ward-Leonard system by a thyristor phase-controlled converter. For four-quadrant control, a dual converter (two fully controlled converters connected back to back) feeds the armature of a separately excited dc motor, whose field is kept constant.
Scheme
+--[Converter P (+I)]--+
ac ------| |---[ M ] field const
+--[Converter N (-I)]--+
P: alpha_P, N: alpha_N = 180 - alpha_P
- Converter P carries positive armature current; converter N carries negative current.
- Each converter can give positive or negative average voltage ().
| Quadrant | Converter | Mode | |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | P | < 90° | Forward motoring |
| II | N | > 90° (inverting) | Forward regenerative braking |
| III | N | < 90° | Reverse motoring |
| IV | P | > 90° (inverting) | Reverse regenerative braking |
To brake from forward motoring, P is blocked, N is fired at so that its voltage is just below ; current reverses and energy returns to the supply.
Non-circulating current scheme
- Only one converter conducts at a time; the other is blocked (no firing pulses).
- On reversal, current in the working converter is brought to zero, a dead time (about 2–10 ms) is allowed for thyristors to recover, then the other converter is fired.
- No inter-group reactor needed; smaller converters, higher efficiency.
- Slower response and possible discontinuous current near zero.
Circulating current scheme
- Both converters are fired continuously with , so their average voltages are equal and opposite in sign around the loop.
- Instantaneous voltages differ, so a reactor is connected between them to limit the circulating current.
- Current can pass smoothly from one converter to the other without dead time: fast, smooth reversal and continuous conduction.
- Costlier: reactor, converters rated for load plus circulating current, extra losses.
Merits over conventional Ward-Leonard
- No rotating machines: less space, weight, foundation, noise and maintenance.
- Higher efficiency (above 95 %) and fast response (milliseconds).
- Lower cost for most ratings; easy closed-loop control.
- Regeneration still possible.
Drawbacks: harmonics and poor power factor at large (low speed).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Ward-Leonard system of speed control · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Four quadrant operation in DC motor control · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Speed of separately excited DC motor (given J, B) · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Plugging of 200 V, 1000 rpm separately excited motor · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Plugging of 220 V separately excited motor (100 A) · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Chopper ON time for separately excited DC motor · Utilization of Electrical Energy, chapter 3
- Separately excited elevator motor with field flux reduced · Electrical Machines I, chapter 4
- 25 kW separately excited DC machine as motor or generator · Electrical Machines I, chapter 3
- Self-excited vs separately excited DC generators · Electrical Machines I, chapter 3
- Static and dynamic circulating calorimetry; measurables · RF and Microwave Engineering, chapter 8