Skip to main content

Static Ward-Leonard four quadrant control

Short answer

Static Ward-Leonard uses a dual converter back-to-back for four-quadrant control; the non-circulating scheme blocks one converter with dead time, while the circulating scheme fires both with alpha sum 180 degrees and uses a reactor. It has no rotating machines, higher efficiency, faster response, and lower maintenance than conventional Ward-Leonard control.

Explain static Ward-Leonard control scheme for four quadrant control of separately excited motor. Discuss non circulating and circulating current schemes. Mention its merits over conventional Ward-Leonard control.

The static Ward-Leonard drive replaces the M–G set of the conventional Ward-Leonard system by a thyristor phase-controlled converter. For four-quadrant control, a dual converter (two fully controlled converters connected back to back) feeds the armature of a separately excited dc motor, whose field is kept constant.

Scheme

          +--[Converter P (+I)]--+
 ac ------|                      |---[ M ]  field const
          +--[Converter N (-I)]--+
   P: alpha_P,  N: alpha_N = 180 - alpha_P
  • Converter P carries positive armature current; converter N carries negative current.
  • Each converter can give positive or negative average voltage (V=Vdocos⁡αV = V_{do}\cos\alpha).
QuadrantConverterα\alphaMode
IP< 90°Forward motoring
IIN> 90° (inverting)Forward regenerative braking
IIIN< 90°Reverse motoring
IVP> 90° (inverting)Reverse regenerative braking

To brake from forward motoring, P is blocked, N is fired at αN>90∘\alpha_N > 90^\circ so that its voltage is just below EbE_b; current reverses and energy returns to the supply.

Non-circulating current scheme

  • Only one converter conducts at a time; the other is blocked (no firing pulses).
  • On reversal, current in the working converter is brought to zero, a dead time (about 2–10 ms) is allowed for thyristors to recover, then the other converter is fired.
  • No inter-group reactor needed; smaller converters, higher efficiency.
  • Slower response and possible discontinuous current near zero.

Circulating current scheme

  • Both converters are fired continuously with αP+αN=180∘\alpha_P + \alpha_N = 180^\circ, so their average voltages are equal and opposite in sign around the loop.
  • Instantaneous voltages differ, so a reactor is connected between them to limit the circulating current.
  • Current can pass smoothly from one converter to the other without dead time: fast, smooth reversal and continuous conduction.
  • Costlier: reactor, converters rated for load plus circulating current, extra losses.

Merits over conventional Ward-Leonard

  • No rotating machines: less space, weight, foundation, noise and maintenance.
  • Higher efficiency (above 95 %) and fast response (milliseconds).
  • Lower cost for most ratings; easy closed-loop control.
  • Regeneration still possible.

Drawbacks: harmonics and poor power factor at large α\alpha (low speed).

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Utilization of Electrical Energy chapter 3 questions →