Skip to main content

Geothermal versus conventional thermal plant

Short answer

Geothermal uses earth's heat with nil fuel cost, low efficiency 10-20%, high capacity factor, and very low emissions, but is site-limited. Thermal plants burn coal, oil, or gas, give 30-40% efficiency, can be located flexibly, but have high fuel cost and pollution.

Compare Geothermal power plant with conventional thermal power plant considering various aspects.

A geothermal power plant uses heat from the earth (steam or hot water from wells), while a conventional thermal plant burns coal, oil or gas in a boiler. Both drive steam turbines.

Comparison

AspectGeothermal plantConventional thermal plant
Heat sourceEarth's internal heatCombustion of fossil fuel
Fuel costNilHigh; major running cost
RenewabilityRenewable if reinjectedNon-renewable
LocationOnly at geothermal fieldsNear load, port or coal mine
Steam conditionLow pressure and temperature (about 150–250 °C)High pressure, superheated (about 540 °C)
EfficiencyLow, about 10–20%About 30–40%
Unit sizeSmall to medium (5–100 MW)Large (100–800 MW)
Boiler / fuel handlingNot neededBoiler, coal handling, ash handling needed
Capacity factorHigh, about 90% (base load)About 60–85%
Load followingPoor; run as base loadModerate
Capital costHigh (exploration and drilling risk)Moderate
EmissionsVery low CO₂; some H₂S, mineral saltsHigh CO₂, SO₂, NOx, particulates
ProblemsCorrosion and scaling by minerals, reservoir depletionFuel supply, ash disposal
Land useSmallLarge (fuel yard, ash ponds)
Life30–50 years (if reservoir managed)25–30 years

Remarks

Geothermal is cleaner and cheaper to run but is site-limited and has lower efficiency; thermal plants are flexible in location and size but costly to run and polluting.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Power Plant Design chapter 1 questions →