- 2075 Asoj · 4+4 marks
Telephone exchange structure; TST vs STS
Short answer
A digital exchange has subscriber line units (BORSCHT), switching network, trunk interfaces, signaling, SPC control, O&M, power and sync. TST uses Time-Space-Time with time expansion, lower blocking, non-blocking if l>=2c-1, for large exchanges; STS uses Space-Time-Space with space expansion, higher blocking, non-blocking if k>=2N-1, for small switches.
Describe technical structure of a telephone exchange. Compare TST and STS switch used in digital telephone exchange system.
Technical structure of a telephone exchange
A telephone exchange connects any subscriber line or trunk to any other on demand. It has the following main subsystems:
Subscribers Other exchanges
| ^
+------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+
| Subscriber |->| Switching |->| Trunk / |
| line units |<-| network |<-| junction |
| (BORSCHT) | | (T, S, TST)| | interface |
+------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+
^ ^ ^ ^
| +--------+ | +--------+
| | Signal-| | |
| | ling |<-->+<-->| Control (SPC
| +--------+ | processors)
+--------------------> +---------------+
O&M: charging, testing, admin
- Subscriber line interface: each line card does BORSCHT (battery feed, over-voltage protection, ringing, supervision, codec, hybrid, testing). Line concentrators combine many lightly used lines onto fewer switch ports.
- Switching network: makes the speech path. In digital exchanges it is a TST (or TSST) network of time switches and space switches.
- Trunk/junction interface: connects to other exchanges on E1 (2.048 Mbps) PCM links, with frame alignment and clock synchronisation.
- Signaling equipment: subscriber signaling (dial tone, DTMF receivers, ringing, busy tone) and inter-exchange signaling (CAS or CCS/SS7).
- Control unit: SPC processors that detect calls, analyse digits, find paths, set the switch, supervise calls and release them.
- Operation and maintenance: charging (billing) records, traffic measurement, alarms, testing and subscriber administration.
- Power and synchronisation: 48 V DC battery plant and a master clock.
Comparison of TST and STS switches
| Point | TST switch | STS switch |
|---|---|---|
| Stage order | Time – Space – Time | Space – Time – Space |
| Centre stage | Space switch (TMS) | TSIs |
| Alternative paths | internal time slots | centre TSIs |
| Blocking | , lower | , higher |
| Expansion method | Time expansion, cheap | Space expansion, costly |
| Non-blocking condition | ||
| Cost for large size | Lower | Higher |
| Use | Large digital exchanges (e.g. Ericsson AXE) | Small switches, light load |
TST is preferred in practice because, for the same blocking, it needs less hardware and its paths are easy to find by searching time slots.
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- TST vs STS; DTMF set pros and cons · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Multistage switching; TST vs STS · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Space and time switches; STS vs TST · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Space switch and why TST is used · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Time switch in digital exchange · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- TST vs STS and three-stage design · Telecommunications, chapter 4
- Digital transmission system; analog vs digital · Instrumentation II, chapter 5
- Compare switch and if-else-if ladder · Computer Programming, chapter 5 · asked 2×
- Digital system, logic level, BCD vs binary · Digital Logic, chapter 1
- Duplex digital communication system vs analog · Communication Systems, chapter 1