- 2073 Chaitra · 4 marks
Al-Cu thermocouple potential difference
Short answer
Use V_{AB} = −(π²k²/6e)[x_A/E_{FA} − x_B/E_{FB}](T² − T₀²) with T₀=273 K, T=373 K and given data. |V_{AB}| ≈ 0.39 mV (Al negative relative to Cu).
Consider a Al-Cu thermocouple pair, Estimate the potential difference available from this thermo-couple if one junctions is held at 0°C and other at 100°C.
| Metal | Fermi Energy, EF (eV) | Constant (x) |
|---|---|---|
| Al | 11.6 | 2.78 |
| Cu | 7.0 | -1.79 |
The Seebeck (thermoelectric) emf of a thermocouple made of metals A and B, with junctions at and , is given by the Mott-Jones free-electron result:
where is the constant for each metal and its Fermi energy. (Each metal has Seebeck coefficient .)
Given: A = Al: eV, ; B = Cu: eV, ; K, K.
Constant term
Bracket term (E_F in joules)
Temperature term
Emf
The negative sign means Al is negative with respect to Cu in this sign convention; the magnitude is what a voltmeter reads.
Answer: (about 391 µV, mV).
✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)
Related questions
- Doping to raise Fermi level by 0.7 eV · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Doping to raise Fermi level by 0.1 eV · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Population density and temperature-independent Fermi energy · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 2
- pn junction: potential, widths, field, Fermi levels · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 6 · asked 2×
- Fermi energy of copper at 0 K and 15°C · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 2
- Importance of Fermi energy in semiconductors · Electrical Engineering Material, chapter 6 · asked 3×
- Precipitation hardening of Al-Cu · Material Science, chapter 9
- Thermocouple time constant and frequency response · Instrumentation and Measurement, chapter 4
- Electrode potential; Cu/Ag cell EMF · Engineering Chemistry, chapter 1
- Electrode potential origin; Zn-Cu cell notation · Engineering Chemistry, chapter 1