Skip to main content

Relation between Young's modulus and bulk modulus

Short answer

Under equal triaxial stress σ, volumetric strain ε_v = 3σ(1-2μ)/E. Since bulk modulus K = σ/ε_v, equating gives E = 3K(1-2μ), requiring μ < 0.5 for positive K.

Derive relationship between young's modulus and bulk modulus.

Result: E=3K(1−2μ)E = 3K(1 - 2\mu) where EE is Young's modulus, KK the bulk modulus and μ\mu Poisson's ratio.

Definitions

  • Bulk modulus: K=volumetric (hydrostatic) stressvolumetric strain=pεvK = \dfrac{\text{volumetric (hydrostatic) stress}}{\text{volumetric strain}} = \dfrac{p}{\varepsilon_v}
  • Volumetric strain εv=δVV\varepsilon_v = \dfrac{\delta V}{V}.

Derivation

Take a cube of side LL subjected to equal stress σ\sigma on all six faces (uniform hydrostatic compression/tension), so σx=σy=σz=σ\sigma_x = \sigma_y = \sigma_z = \sigma.

Strain in the x-direction due to all three stresses (Hooke's law with Poisson effect):

εx=σE−μσE−μσE=σE(1−2μ)\varepsilon_x = \frac{\sigma}{E} - \mu\frac{\sigma}{E} - \mu\frac{\sigma}{E} = \frac{\sigma}{E}(1 - 2\mu)

By symmetry εy=εz=εx\varepsilon_y = \varepsilon_z = \varepsilon_x.

Volume V=L3V = L^3; for small strains the volumetric strain is the sum of the linear strains:

εv=εx+εy+εz=3σE(1−2μ)\varepsilon_v = \varepsilon_x + \varepsilon_y + \varepsilon_z = \frac{3\sigma}{E}(1 - 2\mu)

(Check: V+δV=L3(1+ε)3≈L3(1+3ε)V + \delta V = L^3(1+\varepsilon)^3 \approx L^3(1 + 3\varepsilon).)

From the definition of bulk modulus, with p=σp = \sigma:

K=σεv=σ3σE(1−2μ)=E3(1−2μ)K = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_v} = \frac{\sigma}{\dfrac{3\sigma}{E}(1 - 2\mu)} = \frac{E}{3(1 - 2\mu)} E=3K(1−2μ)\boxed{E = 3K(1 - 2\mu)}

Notes: since KK must be positive, 1−2μ>01 - 2\mu > 0, so μ<0.5\mu < 0.5. For an incompressible material, μ=0.5\mu = 0.5 and K→∞K \to \infty. For example, for steel with μ=0.3\mu = 0.3, K=E/(3×0.4)=0.833EK = E/(3\times0.4) = 0.833E.

✓ Answer checked by Claude Opus 5.5 (high effort)

All Strength of Materials chapter 3 questions →